Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create a slash PR bot to run our ./build.sh command #2353

Merged
merged 44 commits into from
Feb 19, 2023

Conversation

echoix
Copy link
Collaborator

@echoix echoix commented Feb 12, 2023

Fixes #2351

Proposed Changes

  1. Add a slash command dispatcher.
  2. Add a help command
  3. Add a build command

Readiness Checklist

Author/Contributor

  • Add entry to the CHANGELOG listing the change and linking to the corresponding issue (if appropriate)
  • If documentation is needed for this change, has that been included in this pull request

Reviewing Maintainer

  • Label as breaking if this is a large fundamental change
  • Label as either automation, bug, documentation, enhancement, infrastructure, or performance

@echoix
Copy link
Collaborator Author

echoix commented Feb 12, 2023

Oh, and the comment is edited during the run to show progress :)

@echoix
Copy link
Collaborator Author

echoix commented Feb 12, 2023

🦙 MegaLinter status: ⚠️ WARNING

Descriptor Linter Files Fixed Errors Elapsed time
✅ BASH bash-exec 6 0 0.02s
✅ BASH shellcheck 6 0 0.13s
✅ BASH shfmt 6 0 0 0.04s
✅ COPYPASTE jscpd yes no 2.88s
✅ DOCKERFILE hadolint 114 0 13.47s
✅ JSON eslint-plugin-jsonc 21 0 0 1.81s
✅ JSON jsonlint 19 0 0.22s
✅ JSON npm-package-json-lint yes no 0.68s
✅ JSON v8r 21 0 11.92s
⚠️ MARKDOWN markdownlint 309 2 230 5.45s
✅ MARKDOWN markdown-link-check 309 0 5.48s
✅ MARKDOWN markdown-table-formatter 309 2 0 15.0s
✅ OPENAPI spectral 1 0 1.7s
⚠️ PYTHON bandit 183 47 2.05s
✅ PYTHON black 183 0 0 3.53s
✅ PYTHON flake8 183 0 1.8s
✅ PYTHON isort 183 0 0 0.42s
✅ PYTHON mypy 183 0 6.89s
✅ PYTHON pylint 183 0 10.94s
⚠️ PYTHON pyright 183 244 17.47s
✅ REPOSITORY checkov yes no 28.18s
⚠️ REPOSITORY devskim yes 61 1.29s
✅ REPOSITORY dustilock yes no 2.45s
✅ REPOSITORY git_diff yes no 0.05s
✅ REPOSITORY secretlint yes no 7.88s
✅ REPOSITORY syft yes no 0.88s
✅ REPOSITORY trivy yes no 21.18s
✅ SPELL cspell 745 0 16.93s
✅ SPELL misspell 566 2 0 0.56s
✅ XML xmllint 3 0 0 0.03s
✅ YAML prettier 81 2 0 2.34s
✅ YAML v8r 23 0 58.4s
✅ YAML yamllint 82 0 1.25s

See detailed report in MegaLinter reports

You could have same capabilities but better runtime performances if you request a new MegaLinter flavor.

MegaLinter is graciously provided by OX Security

@echoix
Copy link
Collaborator Author

echoix commented Feb 12, 2023

🦙 MegaLinter status: ⚠️ WARNING

Descriptor Linter Files Fixed Errors Elapsed time
✅ BASH bash-exec 6 0 0.02s
✅ BASH shellcheck 6 0 0.13s
✅ BASH shfmt 6 0 0 0.36s
✅ COPYPASTE jscpd yes no 2.75s
✅ DOCKERFILE hadolint 114 0 16.56s
✅ JSON eslint-plugin-jsonc 21 0 0 2.11s
✅ JSON jsonlint 19 0 0.24s
✅ JSON v8r 21 0 12.21s
⚠️ MARKDOWN markdownlint 309 0 230 6.59s
✅ MARKDOWN markdown-link-check 309 0 5.57s
✅ MARKDOWN markdown-table-formatter 309 0 0 17.62s
✅ OPENAPI spectral 1 0 1.63s
⚠️ PYTHON bandit 183 47 1.99s
✅ PYTHON black 183 0 0 3.62s
✅ PYTHON flake8 183 0 1.75s
✅ PYTHON isort 183 0 0 0.73s
✅ PYTHON mypy 183 0 6.89s
✅ PYTHON pylint 183 0 11.58s
⚠️ PYTHON pyright 183 246 17.44s
✅ REPOSITORY checkov yes no 29.15s
✅ REPOSITORY git_diff yes no 0.35s
✅ REPOSITORY secretlint yes no 14.14s
✅ REPOSITORY trivy yes no 27.22s
✅ SPELL cspell 745 0 19.81s
✅ SPELL misspell 566 0 0 0.93s
✅ XML xmllint 3 0 0 0.36s
✅ YAML prettier 81 2 0 3.43s
✅ YAML v8r 23 0 58.0s
✅ YAML yamllint 82 0 1.09s

See detailed report in MegaLinter reports

MegaLinter is graciously provided by OX Security

@echoix
Copy link
Collaborator Author

echoix commented Feb 12, 2023

So I added a skip comment for CKV_GHA_7, Check: CKV_GHA_7: "The build output cannot be affected by user parameters other than the build entry point and the top-level source location. GitHub Actions workflow_dispatch inputs MUST be empty. ".
https://docs.bridgecrew.io/docs/the-build-output-cannot-be-affected-by-user-parameters-other-than-the-build-entry-point-and-the-top-level-source-location-github-actions-workflow_dispatch-inputs-must-be-empty

Since it is not really a build, where we wouldn't want the output to change, here we want it to react to what the slash command dispatcher sends it, to know which comment to target, and to make sure the correct repo is called. Also, it is only users with write permissions that can call a workflow run.

@nvuillam
Copy link
Member

nvuillam commented Feb 12, 2023

I'm not sure I understand everything... plz could you add a section in contributing documentation, with examples ?

@echoix
Copy link
Collaborator Author

echoix commented Feb 12, 2023

Ok, I'll write something soon. But it's for us, maintainers only, so that we could not require contributors to set up everything to run the ./build.sh. Only ask them to change the descriptors, and a quick comment to the PR with the following:

/build

will bring the PR up to date.

@echoix
Copy link
Collaborator Author

echoix commented Feb 18, 2023

@nvuillam Is this enough?
image
And I added the following:
image

@echoix
Copy link
Collaborator Author

echoix commented Feb 19, 2023

@nvuillam Is this enough to be merged? I'm quite eager to start using it soon :)

@nvuillam
Copy link
Member

Just add a screenshot of a comment with the /build, and it's ok for me :)

@echoix
Copy link
Collaborator Author

echoix commented Feb 19, 2023

For now there are 3 code blocks with the exact contents of what is placed.

@nvuillam Is this enough? image And I added the following: image

(Note that there is the "text" language in the top of the fence blocks added since these two screenshots)

To have a real use screenshot, it would have to either be already merged, or I re-setup a new repo with it merged into main. I tested in the beginning by committing to my branch and also main, and once sure that it works, I used the ref=<the-branch-name> to use the workflow of a branch. So I don't have a screenshot accessible now. You can see at the end of echoix#1 what it looks like.

@nvuillam
Copy link
Member

Ok, you can add a screenshot in a next PR :)

Copy link
Member

@nvuillam nvuillam left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great , can't wait to see it in action :)

@nvuillam nvuillam merged commit eb68498 into oxsecurity:main Feb 19, 2023
@echoix
Copy link
Collaborator Author

echoix commented Feb 19, 2023

We'll be able to let users use the built-in web editor (pressing the period (.) key anywhere in github) to make simple edits, and fix the build without launching a real linux environment.

@echoix
Copy link
Collaborator Author

echoix commented Feb 19, 2023

/help

Command Description
/build Updates the Dockerfile, documentation, and other files from the yml descriptors
/build [ref=...] Same as /build, but executes workflow in any branch using the ref named argument. The reference can be a branch, tag, or a commit SHA. This can be useful to test workflows in PR branches before merging.
/help Returns this help message

1 similar comment
@nvuillam
Copy link
Member

nvuillam commented Feb 19, 2023

/help

Command Description
/build Updates the Dockerfile, documentation, and other files from the yml descriptors
/build [ref=...] Same as /build, but executes workflow in any branch using the ref named argument. The reference can be a branch, tag, or a commit SHA. This can be useful to test workflows in PR branches before merging.
/help Returns this help message

@echoix
Copy link
Collaborator Author

echoix commented Feb 19, 2023

image
The 20 concurrent runners are already running, and I can't seem to find a way in github to specify priorities. It seems that they will be run only at the end of all the other builds

@nvuillam
Copy link
Member

@echoix this is related to #2377 :/

@echoix
Copy link
Collaborator Author

echoix commented Feb 19, 2023

@echoix this is related to #2377 :/

Yes and no, yes, since there are already running jobs so the 20 is supposed to be hit https://docs.github.com/en/actions/learn-github-actions/usage-limits-billing-and-administration#usage-limits
but no, since even with one Build & Deploy - DEV job on a branch (at one point, which doesn't have a matrix), other jobs where queued.

But its nothing like in the repos inside OSGeo, on good days (with a lot of contributions, across GDAL, PROJ (popular libraries in GIS), and grass), every 20 minute job has to wait 2h30 to start.

@echoix
Copy link
Collaborator Author

echoix commented Feb 19, 2023

Here we go, the 2s+4s jobs ran :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Create a PR bot to run our ./build.sh command [help wanted]
2 participants