-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 481
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The ability to generalise what we expect from an array #80
Comments
I would find this very useful too. |
uglyog
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 18, 2015
uglyog
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 18, 2015
uglyog
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 17, 2015
uglyog
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 17, 2015
uglyog
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 9, 2015
uglyog
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 9, 2015
uglyog
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 9, 2015
This has finally been implemented. Yay! I've updated both the JUnit and Groovy DSLs to support this. |
Nice! Thanks! |
👍 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I have registered this as an issue on pact-specification, but figured I'd raise it here aswell, as implementers of the specification might have something to say about it, and this is the implementation I'm using. :)
If you would prefer the discussion to conclude in the pact-specification-project before commenting on it, that's perfectly understandable.
Here's my issue at pact-specification:
pact-foundation/pact-specification#14
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: