-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 135
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add check for Immutables reference equality #2210
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
49 changes: 49 additions & 0 deletions
49
...ror-prone/src/main/java/com/palantir/baseline/errorprone/ImmutablesReferenceEquality.java
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ | ||
/* | ||
* (c) Copyright 2022 Palantir Technologies Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
* | ||
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); | ||
* you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. | ||
* You may obtain a copy of the License at | ||
* | ||
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 | ||
* | ||
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software | ||
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, | ||
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. | ||
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and | ||
* limitations under the License. | ||
*/ | ||
package com.palantir.baseline.errorprone; | ||
|
||
import com.google.auto.service.AutoService; | ||
import com.google.errorprone.BugPattern; | ||
import com.google.errorprone.BugPattern.LinkType; | ||
import com.google.errorprone.BugPattern.SeverityLevel; | ||
import com.google.errorprone.VisitorState; | ||
import com.google.errorprone.bugpatterns.AbstractReferenceEquality; | ||
import com.google.errorprone.bugpatterns.BugChecker; | ||
import com.google.errorprone.util.ASTHelpers; | ||
import com.sun.source.tree.ExpressionTree; | ||
import com.sun.tools.javac.code.Symbol.ClassSymbol; | ||
import com.sun.tools.javac.code.Type; | ||
|
||
@AutoService(BugChecker.class) | ||
@BugPattern( | ||
linkType = LinkType.CUSTOM, | ||
link = "https://github.com/palantir/gradle-baseline#baseline-error-prone-checks", | ||
severity = SeverityLevel.ERROR, | ||
summary = "Comparison of Immutables value using reference equality instead of value equality.") | ||
public final class ImmutablesReferenceEquality extends AbstractReferenceEquality { | ||
|
||
@Override | ||
protected boolean matchArgument(ExpressionTree tree, VisitorState state) { | ||
Type type = ASTHelpers.getType(tree); | ||
if (!(type.tsym instanceof ClassSymbol)) { | ||
return false; | ||
} | ||
|
||
ClassSymbol symbol = (ClassSymbol) type.tsym; | ||
|
||
return ASTHelpers.hasAnnotation(symbol, "org.immutables.value.Value.Immutable", state); | ||
} | ||
} |
42 changes: 42 additions & 0 deletions
42
...prone/src/test/java/com/palantir/baseline/errorprone/ImmutablesReferenceEqualityTest.java
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ | ||
/* | ||
* (c) Copyright 2022 Palantir Technologies Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
* | ||
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); | ||
* you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. | ||
* You may obtain a copy of the License at | ||
* | ||
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 | ||
* | ||
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software | ||
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, | ||
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. | ||
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and | ||
* limitations under the License. | ||
*/ | ||
package com.palantir.baseline.errorprone; | ||
|
||
import com.google.errorprone.CompilationTestHelper; | ||
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test; | ||
|
||
public class ImmutablesReferenceEqualityTest { | ||
|
||
@Test | ||
public void test() { | ||
helper().addSourceLines( | ||
"Test.java", | ||
"import org.immutables.value.Value;", | ||
"class Test {", | ||
" static boolean f(Foo foo1, Foo foo2) {", | ||
" // BUG: Diagnostic contains: foo1.equals(foo2)", | ||
" return foo1 == foo2;", | ||
" }", | ||
" @Value.Immutable", | ||
" interface Foo {}", | ||
"}") | ||
.doTest(); | ||
} | ||
|
||
private CompilationTestHelper helper() { | ||
return CompilationTestHelper.newInstance(ImmutablesReferenceEquality.class, getClass()); | ||
} | ||
} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ | ||
type: improvement | ||
improvement: | ||
description: Add `ImmutablesReferenceEquality` check that checks for comparison | ||
of Immutables values using reference equality. | ||
links: | ||
- https://github.com/palantir/gradle-baseline/pull/2210 |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Mind adding a test case that shows the automatic fix? Should we apply suggested fixes by default?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should be consistent with the
ReferenceEquality
check. We don't currently apply that check by default, which is probably the right choice.I would hope that there aren't (m)any existing places where we're using reference equality on immutables values, so I didn't apply this by default.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So it's a bit weird to test the automatic fixes here because the
AbstractReferenceEquality
check actually suggests two fixes.When applying fixes, Error Prone will select the first one. In this case, that's
Objects.equals(foo1, foo2);
which probably isn't the one we want.In tests you can specify a
FixChooser
to pick a specific fix, but using that feels a bit gross here.FWIW the Error Prone
ReferenceEquality
tests don't test the automatic fixes, probably for this reason. I don't think it's that important to test the automatic fixes here, since the automatic fixes aren't part of baseline code.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like Objects.equals, but no strong opinion. Just don't want baseline upgrades to get stuck, but it's not likely many folks have this issue.