Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add bytesbuffers package #128

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 3, 2018
Merged

Add bytesbuffers package #128

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 3, 2018

Conversation

bmoylan
Copy link
Contributor

@bmoylan bmoylan commented Dec 3, 2018

This change is Reviewable

@bmoylan bmoylan requested a review from nmiyake December 3, 2018 19:15
@bmoylan bmoylan force-pushed the bm/bytesbuffers branch 3 times, most recently from 7f4aa24 to c0ee0b1 Compare December 3, 2018 19:23
Copy link
Contributor

@nmiyake nmiyake left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Content looks good! It would be nice to have some documentation (godoc or otherwise) that provides a bit more of a high-level view of when one might want to use the bytesbuffer package -- I actually don't know myself, and being able to figure that out would be nice :)

Reviewed 2 of 2 files at r1.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved

@bmoylan
Copy link
Contributor Author

bmoylan commented Dec 3, 2018

@nmiyake I added an example - do you think that is demonstrative enough?

@nmiyake
Copy link
Contributor

nmiyake commented Dec 3, 2018

Yes, that is much more helpful -- thanks!

@bmoylan bmoylan merged commit b99e4c1 into master Dec 3, 2018
@bmoylan bmoylan deleted the bm/bytesbuffers branch December 3, 2018 21:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants