This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 25, 2021. It is now read-only.
Improved "complete docs" docs #3823
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
1 task
johnwiseheart
suggested changes
Apr 9, 2018
| optionsDescription: Lint.Utils.dedent` | ||
| \`true\` to enable for [${Object.keys(Rule.defaultArguments).join(", ")}]], | ||
| \`true\` to enable for `[${Object.keys(Rule.defaultArguments).join(", ")}]`, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do you need to escape this backtick?
JoshuaKGoldberg
approved these changes
Apr 13, 2018
suchanlee
approved these changes
May 1, 2018
rwaskiewicz
added a commit
to rwaskiewicz/tslint
that referenced
this pull request
May 2, 2018
- Fixes building of master - Add escaping to backticks introduced in palantir#3823
4 tasks
suchanlee
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 2, 2018
- Fixes building of master - Add escaping to backticks introduced in #3823
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR checklist
Overview of change:
It was unclear to me if it works for JSDocs (because in another rule "JSDoc comment" is used instead of "Documentation"
Updated the style for the inline code
Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?
supersedes #3006