ENH: Improve general datetime functions #352
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Still a few TODOs to verify actual types |
bashtage
force-pushed
the
gen-func-datetime
branch
from
87a0692 to
234fa44
Compare
gandhis1
reviewed
Oct 3, 2022
| @@ -87,23 +92,24 @@ def date_range( | |||
| start: str | DatetimeLike | None = ..., | |||
| end: str | DatetimeLike | None = ..., | |||
| periods: int | None = ..., | |||
| # TODO: Test timedelta and Timedelta, update pandas docs | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
These are tested, and the docs are updated (I did them).
Dr-Irv
requested changes
Oct 3, 2022
Dr-Irv
requested changes
Oct 3, 2022
1 task
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
assert_type()to assert the type of any return value