You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The purpose is to check that all of the asv jobs are running w/o error. So modifications can be caught at PR time. I think this will be possible using asv dev rather than trying to compare commits. This could be added onto an existing job I think (so we don't have to build again).
It also might be possible to add a travis job to actually build and compare both environments, this might be possible, again I dont' know if this would take too much time and/or be too flaky. This is not meant to replace our offline benchmarks rather to catch regressions sooner.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The purpose is to check that all of the asv jobs are running w/o error. So modifications can be caught at PR time. I think this will be possible using
asv dev
rather than trying to compare commits. This could be added onto an existing job I think (so we don't have to build again).It also might be possible to add a travis job to actually build and compare both environments, this might be possible, again I dont' know if this would take too much time and/or be too flaky. This is not meant to replace our offline benchmarks rather to catch regressions sooner.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: