-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
TestDataFrame.test_from_records_sequencelike: segfault on armel #4473
Comments
@yarikoptic this still occurring? |
I would/will need to check... recent build of 0.12 still had it though: test_from_records_sequencelike (pandas.tests.test_frame.TestDataFrame) ... Segmentation fault |
unfortunately current master (v0.12.0-761-gaa9d9b9) is still susceptible:
and that is the full function code
in python it is at
seems to happen when v passed to 'infer_dtype' is |
weird thing (as commended in 5150) -- it doesn't segfault on my home armel boxy ... versions of everything are identical if I see it right... only few choices of packages are different... weird... |
do you and/or the other armel have a locale set? (in ci/print_version.py)....? |
ah -- interesting idea! on both boxes:
and print_versions report byteorder: little I guess I should just disable that test on armel for now and be done On Tue, 08 Oct 2013, jreback wrote:
Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Ph.D. |
gr8.....the locale thing is causing all kinds of weird havoc....I think most have been nailed.... |
closing as known failure of locale issues on armel |
Adding a skip test? |
I think @yarikoptic is skipping locally (on armel only) |
Wouldn't you want it to pass on armel without tweaks? On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 9:06 AM, jreback notifications@github.com wrote:
|
in an ideal world sure, but its a locale issue and don't have any easy way to debug. If @yarikoptic wants to great. |
ok....reopen so can add a knownfail test |
@yarikoptic can you put up |
I do not think it would be possible to differentiate easily between box which So here they are Failing: INSTALLED VERSIONSPython: 2.7.5.final.0 pandas: Not installed Not failing (it is also a Debian installation but in a chroot on top of $> python ci/print_versions.py INSTALLED VERSIONSPython: 2.7.5.final.0 Cython: 0.19.1 On Fri, 11 Oct 2013, jreback wrote:
Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Ph.D. |
How about:
And then we leave an open issue if somebody wants to attempt to fix. So here they are Failing: INSTALLED VERSIONSPython: 2.7.5.final.0 pandas: Not installed Not failing (it is also a Debian installation but in a chroot on top of $> python ci/print_versions.py INSTALLED VERSIONSPython: 2.7.5.final.0 Cython: 0.19.1 On Fri, 11 Oct 2013, jreback wrote:
Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Ph.D. — |
@jtratner you are putting something in for this? or just have @yarikoptic skip? |
@yarikoptic pls put a skip on this; too complicated to debug/skip ATM |
for now I even committed a sin -- just built and uploaded to armel without testing.... I will enable a skip for this test on armel in the future upload. |
hahah...thankxs |
ho ho -- I was not expecting it to be closed though since the issue was not fixed per se ;) |
ok...i'll reopen and assign to 0.14...... |
eh -- and since I have sinned last time, now I am paying the price (fails again) so would need finally to add some skip... heh |
looks like @yarikoptic patched on debian side |
gory details
python backtrace
and here what I think was original/generated code
any obvious clues? ;)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: