-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
consolidated the duplicate definitions of NA values (in parsers & IO) #16589
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
bc6752a
consolidated the duplicate definitions of NA values (in parsers & IO)
OlegShteynbuk 0650da0
consolidated the duplicate definitions of NA values in parsers.pyx
OlegShteynbuk b0c1d4d
added blank lines - E302 expected 2 blank lines, found 1 in parsers.pyx
OlegShteynbuk 1f0a350
added pesky blank lines - E302 expected 2 blank lines, found 1 in par…
OlegShteynbuk 0579460
added pesky blank lines - E302 expected 2 blank lines, found 1 in par…
OlegShteynbuk 6225c7c
changed to using existing function _ensure_encoded in parsers.pyx
OlegShteynbuk a7e7f01
reverted na_values.py back to using assert
OlegShteynbuk dc9a368
fixing typo
OlegShteynbuk e8f6e82
convert set to list
OlegShteynbuk 5770506
put definition before reference
OlegShteynbuk 5fa829e
import _NA_VALUES from common instead of parsers, make import explicit
OlegShteynbuk c499448
in import replace common with com
OlegShteynbuk 03a335b
remove duplicate na values in in io.rst
OlegShteynbuk 10cba2c
improved text related to na values in io.rst file
OlegShteynbuk File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can you build the docs and show a rendering of this page. I think this might generate a build warning (and may not render correctly)
@jorisvandenbossche
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have build the docs locally before commit, there were warnings, some of them might be related to python 3, i have 2.7.13 on linux ; file doc/source/style.ipynb also was a problem, but the generated html looks ok, can not attach html file to this replay
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the only difference that i can see is a blank line because of the new label, but it might be not at bad thing at all, but i can remove the label and reuse the existing one that is for the heading NA Values, that will be several lines above