-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.5k
BUG: maybe_promote with dt64tz and mismatched NA #39743
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
jbrockmendel
commented
Feb 11, 2021
- closes #xxxx
- tests added / passed
- Ensure all linting tests pass, see here for how to run them
- whatsnew entry
user facing? |
trying to track this down; many of the cases that would be affected go through DTA/TDA/PA methods instead of maybe_promote |
so far it looks like the answer is "no", but that the reason involves incorrect NAs being ignored somewhere else that i need to track down separately |
increasingly looking like "no" |
OK im now almost positive there is nothing user-facing bc 1) the only currently-incorrect case is in the dt64tz path and 2) that path is AFAICT not reachable by any of the non-test uses of maybe_promote |
ok can you rebase |
rebased + green (no longer a bugfix, just a refactor) |