- 
          
 - 
                Notifications
    
You must be signed in to change notification settings  - Fork 19.2k
 
REGR: properly update DataFrame cache in Series.__setitem__ #48215
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
          
     Merged
      
      
            simonjayhawkins
  merged 8 commits into
  pandas-dev:main
from
jorisvandenbossche:regr-series-cache-leak
  
      
      
   
  Aug 26, 2022 
      
    
      
        
          +20
        
        
          −1
        
        
          
        
      
    
  
  
     Merged
                    Changes from all commits
      Commits
    
    
            Show all changes
          
          
            8 commits
          
        
        Select commit
          Hold shift + click to select a range
      
      0f7f932
              
                REGR: properly update DataFrame cache in Series.__setitem__
              
              
                jorisvandenbossche f8805df
              
                Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into regr-series-cache-leak
              
              
                jorisvandenbossche b567d02
              
                whatsnew
              
              
                jorisvandenbossche 253a7a5
              
                add test
              
              
                jorisvandenbossche 2ec2673
              
                Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into regr-series-cache-leak
              
              
                jorisvandenbossche f32ef47
              
                skip for array managet (accesses blocks)
              
              
                jorisvandenbossche 8c75621
              
                Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into regr-series-cache-leak
              
              
                jorisvandenbossche 3dc008a
              
                update whatsnew
              
              
                jorisvandenbossche File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
          Failed to load comments.   
        
        
          
      Loading
        
  Jump to
        
          Jump to file
        
      
      
          Failed to load files.   
        
        
          
      Loading
        
  Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this skips whereas
skip_array_manager_not_yet_implementedxfails.Now this test fails with
AttributeError: 'ArrayManager' object has no attribute 'blocks'since we are explicitly testing the BlockManager values.so it does make sense to just skip.
but are we likely to want a similar test for array manger?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, I think it indeed makes sense to skip this test instead of xfail, since the way is written is not intended to ever work for ArrayManager. But so we could indeed write a separate test that checks for the the ArrayManager case (but I would say it's maybe not a super high priority, I can only take a look in the weekend).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
no problem. not a blocker.