Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

STY: Use ruff instead of pygrep check for future annotation import #56666

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 29, 2023
Merged

STY: Use ruff instead of pygrep check for future annotation import #56666

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 29, 2023

Conversation

mroeschke
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@mroeschke mroeschke added the Code Style Code style, linting, code_checks label Dec 28, 2023
@mroeschke mroeschke added this to the 2.2 milestone Dec 28, 2023
@lithomas1 lithomas1 merged commit 522ba17 into pandas-dev:main Dec 29, 2023
53 of 54 checks passed
@lithomas1
Copy link
Member

thanks @mroeschke

@meeseeksmachine meeseeksmachine mentioned this pull request Dec 29, 2023
Merged
meeseeksmachine pushed a commit to meeseeksmachine/pandas that referenced this pull request Dec 29, 2023
@mroeschke @meeseeksmachine
Backport PR pandas-dev#56666: STY: Use ruff instead of pygrep check f…
ec3643c 
…or future annotation import
@mroeschke mroeschke deleted the sty/ruff/fa branch December 29, 2023 22:58
mroeschke added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 29, 2023
@meeseeksmachine @mroeschke
Backport PR #56666 on branch 2.2.x (STY: Use ruff instead of pygrep c…
80ad64f 
…heck for future annotation import) (#56683)

Backport PR #56666: STY: Use ruff instead of pygrep check for future annotation import

Co-authored-by: Matthew Roeschke <10647082+mroeschke@users.noreply.github.com>
cbpygit pushed a commit to cbpygit/pandas that referenced this pull request Jan 2, 2024
@mroeschke @cbpygit
STY: Use ruff instead of pygrep check for future annotation import (p…
cb4fd95 
…andas-dev#56666)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@lithomas1 lithomas1 lithomas1 approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Code Style Code style, linting, code_checks
Projects
None yet
Milestone
2.2
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@mroeschke @lithomas1