Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Silence the scie-pants version warning when NO_SCIE_WARNING=1 #19660

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 24, 2023

Conversation

huonw
Copy link
Contributor

@huonw huonw commented Aug 23, 2023

Before this fix, #19654 was causing pants ... commands in the pants repo to explode and not work. This fixes it by silencing them in the pants repo, keying off the existing NO_SCIE_WARNING=1 mechanism.

Running scie-pants in the pants repo goes through a special bootstrap mechanism, that's bootstrapped outside the scie-pants processing on purpose. This in particular means that the scie-pants version check from #19600 / #19654 doesn't work, because it's not invoked via that mechanism. Fortunately, this can just be treated the same as the "am I running in scie-pants at all?" check, looking for the env var set by the pants repo bootstrapper.

The version check has to be strict about the SCIE_PANTS_VERSION environment variable, and it cannot just do nothing when that's not set. The goal with this check is to help people using upgrade to scie-pants 0.9+ before Pants 2.18 is released, because Pants 2.18 has a new distribution mechanism that's only supported by scie-pants 0.9+ (this is why we needed to land #19654 last minute, to be in Pants 2.17). scie-pants only sets the environment variable in version 0.9 too, so a user using scie-pants 0.8.0 will be running Pants 2.17 without setting SCIE_PANTS_VERSION, and so, to help them upgrade, we have to assume "doesn't exist" = "scie-pants is too old". The pants repo custom bootstrap doesn't set this env var, and hence used to fall into that trap.

@huonw huonw added the category:internal CI, fixes for not-yet-released features, etc. label Aug 23, 2023
@huonw huonw merged commit 1d9886a into main Aug 24, 2023
24 checks passed
@huonw huonw deleted the huonw/bugfix/no-warning-in-pants-repo branch August 24, 2023 00:04
@huonw huonw modified the milestones: 2.17.x, 2.18.x Aug 29, 2023
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2023
Before this fix, #19654 was causing `pants ...` commands in the pants
repo to explode and not work. This fixes it by silencing them in the
pants repo, keying off the existing `NO_SCIE_WARNING=1` mechanism.

Running scie-pants in the pants repo goes through a special bootstrap
mechanism, that's bootstrapped outside the scie-pants processing on
purpose. This in particular means that the scie-pants version check from
#19600 / #19654 doesn't work, because it's not invoked via that
mechanism. Fortunately, this can just be treated the same as the "am I
running in scie-pants at all?" check, looking for the env var set by the
pants repo bootstrapper.

The version check has to be strict about the `SCIE_PANTS_VERSION`
environment variable, and it cannot just do nothing when that's not set.
The goal with this check is to help people using upgrade to scie-pants
0.9+ _before_ Pants 2.18 is released, because Pants 2.18 has a new
distribution mechanism that's only supported by scie-pants 0.9+ (this is
why we needed to land #19654 last minute, to be in Pants 2.17).
scie-pants only sets the environment variable in version 0.9 too, so a
user using scie-pants 0.8.0 will be running Pants 2.17 without setting
`SCIE_PANTS_VERSION`, and so, to help them upgrade, we have to assume
"doesn't exist" = "scie-pants is too old". The pants repo custom
bootstrap doesn't set this env var, and hence used to fall into that
trap.
@WorkerPants
Copy link
Member

I tried to automatically cherry-pick this change back to each relevant milestone, so that it is available in those older releases of Pants.

✔️ 2.18.x

Successfully opened #19702.


Thanks again for your contributions!

🤖 Beep Boop here's my run link

huonw added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2023
…-pick of #19660) (#19702)

Before this fix, #19654 was causing `pants ...` commands in the pants
repo to explode and not work. This fixes it by silencing them in the
pants repo, keying off the existing `NO_SCIE_WARNING=1` mechanism.

Running scie-pants in the pants repo goes through a special bootstrap
mechanism, that's bootstrapped outside the scie-pants processing on
purpose. This in particular means that the scie-pants version check from
#19600 / #19654 doesn't work, because it's not invoked via that
mechanism. Fortunately, this can just be treated the same as the "am I
running in scie-pants at all?" check, looking for the env var set by the
pants repo bootstrapper.

The version check has to be strict about the `SCIE_PANTS_VERSION`
environment variable, and it cannot just do nothing when that's not set.
The goal with this check is to help people using upgrade to scie-pants
0.9+ _before_ Pants 2.18 is released, because Pants 2.18 has a new
distribution mechanism that's only supported by scie-pants 0.9+ (this is
why we needed to land #19654 last minute, to be in Pants 2.17).
scie-pants only sets the environment variable in version 0.9 too, so a
user using scie-pants 0.8.0 will be running Pants 2.17 without setting
`SCIE_PANTS_VERSION`, and so, to help them upgrade, we have to assume
"doesn't exist" = "scie-pants is too old". The pants repo custom
bootstrap doesn't set this env var, and hence used to fall into that
trap.

Co-authored-by: Huon Wilson <huon@exoflare.io>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
category:internal CI, fixes for not-yet-released features, etc.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants