-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 646
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Anonymize sandbox paths instead of stripping completely #20492
Open
tgolsson
wants to merge
9
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
ts/keep-sandbox-prefix
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d14331c
do not completely strip out sandboxes from logs
tgolsson 75677dc
improve name
2d856a6
add fix for PATH greediness
f064748
add another test case
ba2f244
update from feedback
9a8d3d2
fix
0c16d42
add type hints
tgolsson 34c3a56
add notes
tgolsson f38de10
fix tests
tgolsson File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This sort of cross-cutting thing often goes in a dedicated "overall" section: https://github.com/pantsbuild/pants/blob/main/docs/notes/2.20.x.md#overall
Maybe you could add one after "new options system" and move it up there? (I personally find it easier to read release notes where the changes are grouped by area rather than by "size"/"type")
Also, I think this may soon (pantsbuild/pantsbuild.org#184) be rendered in places that don't auto-link the GitHub issues:
(I note that we haven't historically been linking the PRs/issues for everything, although maybe it'd be good to do more consistently.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Or, maybe the doc site renderer we use (docusaurus) can do auto-linking. I'm not sure, but it seems plausible 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Had the same thought about auto linking during doc site rendering.. :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I did a quick look through their docs and source code, and I couldn't find any indication of auto-linking support, so we'd have to write a plugin (and/or contribute it upstream)... so, for now, let's just write the links manually to ensure they work everywhere?
I've filed pantsbuild/pantsbuild.org#203