Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: mv ChangedAccount #10472

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 24, 2024
Merged

Conversation

tcoratger
Copy link
Contributor

Before the ChangedAccount structure was included in the transaction pool crate. However, as it is used mainly with our execution types, it seems more straightforward to move it to our execution type crate as long as the changed_accounts method which is now directly implemented for ExecutionOutcome.

@onbjerg onbjerg changed the title evm: mv ChangedAccount refactor: mv ChangedAccount Aug 23, 2024
Copy link
Member

@onbjerg onbjerg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@onbjerg onbjerg added the C-debt Refactor of code section that is hard to understand or maintain label Aug 23, 2024
Co-authored-by: Roman Krasiuk <rokrassyuk@gmail.com>
@onbjerg
Copy link
Member

onbjerg commented Aug 23, 2024

tests are failing somehow, can you take a look?

@tcoratger
Copy link
Contributor Author

tests are failing somehow, can you take a look?

@onbjerg Just fixed

Copy link
Collaborator

@mattsse mattsse left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

makes sense, interestingly we don't have this particular account type yet

@mattsse mattsse added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 24, 2024
Merged via the queue into paradigmxyz:main with commit 4544287 Aug 24, 2024
34 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
C-debt Refactor of code section that is hard to understand or maintain
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants