feat: add Receipt AT to writer traits
#12892
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
klkvr
force-pushed
the
klkvr/provider-receipt-generic
branch
from
766e72f to
172c02a
Compare
klkvr
force-pushed
the
klkvr/writer-receipt-generic
branch
from
ac3a467 to
a11b936
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Based on #12890, #12887
Adds
ReceiptAT to writer traits which operate onExecutionOutcomeI've merged
StateChangeWritertrait intoStateWritertrait to avoid having separate generics on those. They were separated before becauseStateWriterwas implemented separately onUnifiedStorageWriterwhich was changed in #12878With this PR providers now do not depend on concrete primitive types besides
Headerwhich we've agreed to abstract a bit later