feat(rpc-testing-util): rpc tracing compare testing support

[DoTheBestToGetTheBest]

#5146

• Added function to fetch and compare data with trace_block responses asserting that the results are consistent between both RPC (Reth and another Client).

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #5148 (e7f799b) into main (b71a8ac) will decrease coverage by 50.88%.
Report is 19 commits behind head on main.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

❗ Current head e7f799b differs from pull request most recent head 634a5c7. Consider uploading reports for the commit 634a5c7 to get more accurate results

Files	Coverage Δ
crates/rpc/rpc-testing-util/src/trace.rs	0.00% <0.00%> (-26.03%)	⬇️

... and 422 files with indirect coverage changes

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration-tests	17.05% <0.00%> (-0.02%)	⬇️
unit-tests	?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
reth binary	6.18% <ø> (-24.40%)	⬇️
blockchain tree	0.00% <ø> (-80.83%)	⬇️
pipeline	0.00% <ø> (-88.27%)	⬇️
storage (db)	16.66% <ø> (-57.94%)	⬇️
trie	0.00% <ø> (-94.97%)	⬇️
txpool	32.20% <ø> (-23.12%)	⬇️
networking	28.86% <ø> (-49.36%)	⬇️
rpc	23.76% <0.00%> (-33.95%)	⬇️
consensus	0.88% <ø> (-62.13%)	⬇️
revm	1.33% <ø> (-23.15%)	⬇️
payload builder	7.95% <ø> (ø)
primitives	21.05% <ø> (-63.73%)	⬇️

[mattsse]

this should take two clients, ideally abstracted over jsonrpsee client traits

[DoTheBestToGetTheBest]

this should take two clients, ideally abstracted over jsonrpsee client traits

Change has been made & improved docs

Hope this is good for you boss :)

Thank you for giving me those information ! I never tought it was better with this way !

[mattsse]

this is not quite perfect, but good enough for the testing we need and can be modified when we have further requirements