-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve locking mechanism for parachains #4
Conversation
/rfc-propose |
Hey @rzadp, here is a link you can use to create the referendum aiming to approve this RFC number 0014. it is based on commit hash e71a82a49143be8dd67fa7da98379e517c331bea. The proposed remark text is: |
/rfc propose |
Hey @rzadp, here is a link you can use to create the referendum aiming to approve this RFC number 0014. Instructions
It is based on commit hash e71a82a49143be8dd67fa7da98379e517c331bea. The proposed remark text is: |
/rfc process 0x39fbc57d047c71f553aa42824599a7686aea5c9aab4111f6b836d35d3d058162 |
/rfc process 0x39fbc57d047c71f553aa42824599a7686aea5c9aab4111f6b836d35d3d058162 |
/rfc process 0x39fbc57d047c71f553aa42824599a7686aea5c9aab4111f6b836d35d3d058162 |
/rfc propose |
Hey @rzadp, here is a link you can use to create the referendum aiming to approve this RFC number 0014. Instructions
It is based on commit hash e71a82a49143be8dd67fa7da98379e517c331bea. The proposed remark text is: |
/rfc process 0x39fbc57d047c71f553aa42824599a7686aea5c9aab4111f6b836d35d3d058162 |
/rfc process 0x39fbc57d047c71f553aa42824599a7686aea5c9aab4111f6b836d35d3d058162 |
The on-chain referendum has approved the RFC. |
Original PR and referendum: