We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Original comment: https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/pull/1983/files#r1144296320 So right now we have this XcmRouterWeigher in the bridge-runtime-common, which is a copy of what @bkontur did with RBH and WBH. For Rialto/Millau/RialtoParachain, it is fine, but for RBH/WBH (and especially for KBH/PBH) it requires some fixes (see comment for details).
XcmRouterWeigher
bridge-runtime-common
cc @bkontur
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm currently exploring the benchmark-message-dispatch-weight option. Will come back with results
Sorry, something went wrong.
[ci] Add variable to disable selected jobs (#1986)
3d13ae0
* [ci] Add variable to disable selected jobs * apply suggestion Co-authored-by: parity-processbot <>
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Original comment: https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/pull/1983/files#r1144296320
So right now we have this
XcmRouterWeigher
in thebridge-runtime-common
, which is a copy of what @bkontur did with RBH and WBH. For Rialto/Millau/RialtoParachain, it is fine, but for RBH/WBH (and especially for KBH/PBH) it requires some fixes (see comment for details).cc @bkontur
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: