Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Follow-up on #663 #693

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 31, 2025
Merged

Follow-up on #663 #693

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 31, 2025

Conversation

serban300
Copy link
Contributor

@serban300 serban300 commented Jan 30, 2025

Fixes #691

Follow-up on #663
Reverting one more thing as per #545

@serban300 serban300 requested a review from gui1117 January 30, 2025 17:20
@serban300 serban300 self-assigned this Jan 30, 2025
@serban300 serban300 mentioned this pull request Jan 30, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@gui1117 gui1117 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This code is now the same 3.6.9
So one less breaking change.

@serban300 serban300 merged commit bff4de9 into paritytech:master Jan 31, 2025
17 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Issue with bounds
2 participants