XCM: Deprecate old functions #1645
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
KiChjang
approved these changes
Sep 20, 2023
franciscoaguirre
approved these changes
Sep 20, 2023
5 tasks
bkontur
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 10, 2023
…orted_asset` benchmarks (#1726) # Description ## Summary Previously, the `pallet_xcm::do_reserve_transfer_assets` and `pallet_xcm::do_teleport_assets` functions relied on weight estimation for remote chain execution, which was based on guesswork derived from the local chain. This approach led to complications for runtimes that did not provide or support specific [XCM configurations](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/7cbe0c76ef8fd2aabf9f07de0156941ce3ed44b0/polkadot/xcm/xcm-executor/src/config.rs#L43-L47) for `IsReserve` or `IsTeleporter`. Consequently, such runtimes had to resort to implementing hard-coded weights for XCM instructions like `reserve_asset_deposited` or `receive_teleported_asset` to support extrinsics such as `pallet_xcm::reserve_transfer_assets` and `pallet_xcm::teleport_assets`, which depended on remote weight estimation. The issue of remote weight estimation was addressed and resolved by [Pull Request #1645](#1645), which removed the need for remote weight estimation. ## Solution As a continuation of this improvement, the current PR proposes further cleanup by removing unnecessary hard-coded values and rectifying benchmark results with `Weight::MAX` that previously used `T::BlockWeights::get().max_block` as an override for unsupported XCM instructions like `ReserveAssetDeposited` and `ReceiveTeleportedAsset`. ## Questions - [x] Can we remove now also `Hardcoded till the XCM pallet is fixed` for `deposit_asset`? E.g. for AssetHubKusama [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/7cbe0c76ef8fd2aabf9f07de0156941ce3ed44b0/cumulus/parachains/runtimes/assets/asset-hub-kusama/src/weights/xcm/mod.rs#L129-L134) - [x] Are comments like [this](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/7cbe0c76ef8fd2aabf9f07de0156941ce3ed44b0/polkadot/runtime/kusama/src/weights/xcm/mod.rs#L94) `// Kusama doesn't support ReserveAssetDeposited, so this benchmark has a default weight` still relevant? Shouldnt be removed/changed? ## TODO - [x] `bench bot` regenerate xcm weights for all runtimes - [x] remove hard-coded stuff from system parachain weight files - [ ] when merged, open `polkadot-fellow/runtimes` PR ## References Fixes #1132 Closes #1132 Old polkadot repo [PR](paritytech/polkadot#7546) --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
|
This pull request has been mentioned on Polkadot Forum. There might be relevant details there: https://forum.polkadot.network/t/polkadot-release-analysis-v1-2-0/4451/1 |
franciscoaguirre
pushed a commit
to paritytech/xcm
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 25, 2024
…orted_asset` benchmarks (#1726) # Description ## Summary Previously, the `pallet_xcm::do_reserve_transfer_assets` and `pallet_xcm::do_teleport_assets` functions relied on weight estimation for remote chain execution, which was based on guesswork derived from the local chain. This approach led to complications for runtimes that did not provide or support specific [XCM configurations](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/7cbe0c76ef8fd2aabf9f07de0156941ce3ed44b0/polkadot/xcm/xcm-executor/src/config.rs#L43-L47) for `IsReserve` or `IsTeleporter`. Consequently, such runtimes had to resort to implementing hard-coded weights for XCM instructions like `reserve_asset_deposited` or `receive_teleported_asset` to support extrinsics such as `pallet_xcm::reserve_transfer_assets` and `pallet_xcm::teleport_assets`, which depended on remote weight estimation. The issue of remote weight estimation was addressed and resolved by [Pull Request #1645](paritytech/polkadot-sdk#1645), which removed the need for remote weight estimation. ## Solution As a continuation of this improvement, the current PR proposes further cleanup by removing unnecessary hard-coded values and rectifying benchmark results with `Weight::MAX` that previously used `T::BlockWeights::get().max_block` as an override for unsupported XCM instructions like `ReserveAssetDeposited` and `ReceiveTeleportedAsset`. ## Questions - [x] Can we remove now also `Hardcoded till the XCM pallet is fixed` for `deposit_asset`? E.g. for AssetHubKusama [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/7cbe0c76ef8fd2aabf9f07de0156941ce3ed44b0/cumulus/parachains/runtimes/assets/asset-hub-kusama/src/weights/xcm/mod.rs#L129-L134) - [x] Are comments like [this](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/7cbe0c76ef8fd2aabf9f07de0156941ce3ed44b0/polkadot/runtime/kusama/src/weights/xcm/mod.rs#L94) `// Kusama doesn't support ReserveAssetDeposited, so this benchmark has a default weight` still relevant? Shouldnt be removed/changed? ## TODO - [x] `bench bot` regenerate xcm weights for all runtimes - [x] remove hard-coded stuff from system parachain weight files - [ ] when merged, open `polkadot-fellow/runtimes` PR ## References Fixes #1132 Closes #1132 Old polkadot repo [PR](paritytech/polkadot#7546) --------- Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
serban300
pushed a commit
to serban300/polkadot-sdk
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 26, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Two old functions should be deprecated and have their code altered in line with capabilities of XCMv2 and above.
This means we can use the proper
Unlimitedform of weight limit rather than guessing weight from the local chain.