Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

tweak pallet macro (genesis_config etc) to cater for RA users as well. #1689

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 25, 2023
Merged

tweak pallet macro (genesis_config etc) to cater for RA users as well. #1689

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 25, 2023

Conversation

kianenigma
Copy link
Contributor

Small tweak to #1642 to incorporate the ideas from #247.

I think this is the good middle ground, where we have good rust-docs, and the RA users will also have some hope.

cc @wentelteefje @aaronbassett @sam0x17

@kianenigma kianenigma added the R0-silent Changes should not be mentioned in any release notes label Sep 25, 2023
@kianenigma kianenigma requested review from a team September 25, 2023 07:05
sam0x17
sam0x17 approved these changes Sep 25, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@sam0x17 sam0x17 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, this is a good compromise

bkchr
bkchr approved these changes Sep 25, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@bkchr bkchr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would prefer we just fix the issue in RA :P

@bkchr bkchr merged commit b5fcdff into master Sep 25, 2023
14 checks passed
@bkchr bkchr deleted the kiz-tweak-pallet-macro-doc-stuff branch September 25, 2023 09:38
@sam0x17
Copy link
Contributor

sam0x17 commented Sep 25, 2023

I would prefer we just fix the issue in RA :P

They've sort of reacted with "wontfix" so the timeline is going to be long

@wentelteefje wentelteefje mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2023
Merged
3 tasks
ordian added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2023
@ordian
merge master and resolve conflicts (v8)
6fb4b7f 
* master: (61 commits)
  OpenGov in Westend and Rococo (#1177)
  Associated type Hasher for `QueryPreimage`, `StorePreimage` and `Bounded` (#1720)
  Migrate polkadot-primitives to v6 (#1543)
  genesis-builder: implemented for all runtimes (#1492)
  `BlockId` removal: `tx-pool` refactor (#1678)
  Bump directories from 4.0.1 to 5.0.1 (#1656)
  Allow debug_assertions in short-benchmarks CI job (#1711)
  chainHead/storage: Fix storage iteration using the query key (#1665)
  Implement more useful traits in `Slot` type (#1595)
  Make downloads in parallel and give more time to complete (#1699)
  Bump actions/checkout from 4.0.0 to 4.1.0 (#1688)
  contracts: Fix incorrect storage alias in mirgration (#1687)
  Fix documentation about justification and `finalized == true` requirement (#1607)
  tweak pallet macro (genesis_config etc) to cater for RA users as well. (#1689)
  Uncoupling pallet-xcm from frame-system's RuntimeCall (#1684)
  Bump aes-gcm from 0.10.2 to 0.10.3 (#1681)
  docs / Update PR template to reflect monorepo (#1674)
  update contributing guide and ui-tests scripts (#1668)
  pallet epm: add `TrimmingStatus` to the mined solution (#1659)
  Update HRMP pallet benchmarking to use benchmarks v2 (#1676)
  ...
@kiltbot kiltbot mentioned this pull request Oct 19, 2023
Closed
kianenigma added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2023
@wentelteefje @kianenigma
Improve FRAME storage docs (#1714)
b6965af 
This is a port (and hopefully a small improvement) of @kianenigma's PR
from the old Substrate repo:
paritytech/substrate#13987. Following #1689 I
moved the documentation of all macros relevant to this PR from
`frame_support_procedural` to `pallet_macros` while including a hint for
RA users.

Question: Again with respect to #1689: Is there a good reason why we
should *not* enhance paths with links to our current rustdocs? For
example, instead of
```rust
/// **Rust-Analyzer users**: See the documentation of the Rust item in
/// `frame_support::pallet_macros::storage`.
```
we could write
```rust
/// **Rust-Analyzer users**: See the documentation of the Rust item in
/// [`frame_support::pallet_macros::storage`](https://paritytech.github.io/polkadot-sdk/master/frame_support/pallet_macros/attr.storage.html).
```
This results in a clickable link like this:
<img width="674" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/assets/10713977/c129e622-3942-4eeb-8acf-93ee4efdc99d">
I don't really expect the links to become outdated any time soon, but I
think this would be a great UX improvement over just having paths.

TODOs:
- [ ] Add documentation for `constant_name` macro
- [x] Add proper documentation for different `QueryKinds`, i.e.
`OptionQuery`, `ValueQuery`, `ResultQuery`. One example for each. Custom
`OnEmpty` should be moved to `QueryKinds` trait doc page.
- [ ] Rework `type_value` docs

---------

Co-authored-by: kianenigma <kian@parity.io>
bgallois pushed a commit to duniter/duniter-polkadot-sdk that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2024
@kianenigma
tweak pallet macro (genesis_config etc) to cater for RA users as well. (
7dc08a4 
paritytech#1689)

Small tweak to paritytech#1642 to
incorporate the ideas from
paritytech#247.

I think this is the good middle ground, where we have good rust-docs,
and the RA users will also have some hope.

cc @wentelteefje @aaronbassett @sam0x17
bgallois pushed a commit to duniter/duniter-polkadot-sdk that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2024
@wentelteefje @kianenigma
Improve FRAME storage docs (paritytech#1714)
4a63a40 
This is a port (and hopefully a small improvement) of @kianenigma's PR
from the old Substrate repo:
paritytech/substrate#13987. Following paritytech#1689 I
moved the documentation of all macros relevant to this PR from
`frame_support_procedural` to `pallet_macros` while including a hint for
RA users.

Question: Again with respect to paritytech#1689: Is there a good reason why we
should *not* enhance paths with links to our current rustdocs? For
example, instead of
```rust
/// **Rust-Analyzer users**: See the documentation of the Rust item in
/// `frame_support::pallet_macros::storage`.
```
we could write
```rust
/// **Rust-Analyzer users**: See the documentation of the Rust item in
/// [`frame_support::pallet_macros::storage`](https://paritytech.github.io/polkadot-sdk/master/frame_support/pallet_macros/attr.storage.html).
```
This results in a clickable link like this:
<img width="674" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/assets/10713977/c129e622-3942-4eeb-8acf-93ee4efdc99d">
I don't really expect the links to become outdated any time soon, but I
think this would be a great UX improvement over just having paths.

TODOs:
- [ ] Add documentation for `constant_name` macro
- [x] Add proper documentation for different `QueryKinds`, i.e.
`OptionQuery`, `ValueQuery`, `ResultQuery`. One example for each. Custom
`OnEmpty` should be moved to `QueryKinds` trait doc page.
- [ ] Rework `type_value` docs

---------

Co-authored-by: kianenigma <kian@parity.io>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@liamaharon liamaharon liamaharon approved these changes

@wentelteefje wentelteefje wentelteefje approved these changes

@bkchr bkchr bkchr approved these changes

@sam0x17 sam0x17 sam0x17 approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
R0-silent Changes should not be mentioned in any release notes
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants
@kianenigma @sam0x17 @bkchr @wentelteefje @liamaharon