Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Elastic scaling: use an assumed CoreIndex in candidate-backing #3229

Merged
merged 24 commits into from
Feb 22, 2024

Conversation

sandreim
Copy link
Contributor

@sandreim sandreim commented Feb 6, 2024

First step in implementing #3144

Summary of changes

  • switch statement Table candidate mapping from ParaId to CoreIndex
  • introduce experimental InjectCoreIndex node feature.
  • determine and assume a CoreIndex for a candidate based on statement validator index. If the signature is valid it means validator controls the validator that index and we can easily map it to a validator group/core.
  • introduce a temporary provisioner fix until we fully enable elastic scaling in the subystem. The fix ensures we don't fetch the same backable candidate when calling get_backable_candidate for each core.

TODO:

  • fix backing tests
  • fix statement table tests
  • add new test

Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>
@sandreim sandreim added R0-silent Changes should not be mentioned in any release notes T0-node This PR/Issue is related to the topic “node”. T8-polkadot This PR/Issue is related to/affects the Polkadot network. labels Feb 12, 2024
@sandreim sandreim marked this pull request as ready for review February 12, 2024 12:39
Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>
Copy link
Contributor

@alindima alindima left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good! Nice work!

Cargo.lock Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
polkadot/node/core/backing/src/lib.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
polkadot/node/core/backing/src/lib.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
polkadot/node/core/provisioner/src/lib.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
polkadot/node/core/provisioner/src/lib.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
polkadot/primitives/src/v6/mod.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
polkadot/primitives/src/vstaging/mod.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>
/// The validator groups at this relay parent.
validator_groups: Vec<Vec<ValidatorIndex>>,
/// The associated group rotation information.
group_rotation_info: GroupRotationInfo,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Those two are really per session. Storing them per relay parent is rather unnecessary. Seems fine for an interim solution though.

if inject_core_index {
let core_index_to_inject: BitVec<u8, BitOrderLsb0> =
BitVec::from_vec(vec![core_index.0 as u8]);
validator_indices.extend(core_index_to_inject);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't we be using some nice BackedCandidate function to be introduced in the other PR for that?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

that's a good idea, will do that in the follow-up PR

polkadot/node/core/backing/src/lib.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@alindima alindima force-pushed the sandreim/backing_multiple_cores_per_para branch from 7bd84bd to 8398bb1 Compare February 20, 2024 15:59
/// The validator groups at this relay parent.
validator_groups: Vec<Vec<ValidatorIndex>>,
/// The validator index -> group mapping at this relay parent.
validator_to_group: IndexedVec<ValidatorIndex, Option<GroupIndex>>,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it really necessary to copy this to the relay parent state? Can't we just keep the session index here and then fetch a reference from state directly where we need it?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this being an LruMap, it makes it a bit harder to reason about the existence of the session index in the map.

And we can't store a mutable reference here and just populate the map when the session is not present because we'd need to hand out multiple mutable references.

Realistically, backing can only happen on the current session, right? So the LruMap doesn't need a capacity larger than 1 (so then, it doesn't even need to be a LruMap). Am I right?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

with current async backing code, we cannot start backing a candidate in the next session in advance. But we may want to keep this possibility, making the LruMap neccessary.

What I can do is wrap it in an Arc, because they don't need to modify it. Which would achieve the same

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done. I'll merge it once CI passes again

@alindima alindima added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 22, 2024
Merged via the queue into master with commit 60e537b Feb 22, 2024
129 of 130 checks passed
@alindima alindima deleted the sandreim/backing_multiple_cores_per_para branch February 22, 2024 08:47
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 23, 2024
…rent cores (#3231)

Fixes #3144

Builds on top of #3229

### Summary
Some preparations for Runtime to support elastic scaling, guarded by
config node features bit `FeatureIndex::ElasticScalingMVP`. This PR
introduces a per-candidate `CoreIndex` but does it in a hacky way to
avoid changing `CandidateCommitments`, `CandidateReceipts` primitives
and networking protocols.

#### Including `CoreIndex` in `BackedCandidate`
If the `ElasticScalingMVP` feature bit is enabled then
`BackedCandidate::validator_indices` is extended by 8 bits.
The value stored in these bits represents the assumed core index for the
candidate.

It is temporary solution which works by creating a mapping from
`BackedCandidate` to `CoreIndex` by assuming the `CoreIndex` can be
discovered by checking in which validator group the validator that
signed the statement is.

TODO:
- [x] fix tests
- [x] add new tests
- [x] Bump runtime API for Kusama, so we have that node features thing!
-> polkadot-fellows/runtimes#194

---------

Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>
Signed-off-by: alindima <alin@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: alindima <alin@parity.io>
eskimor pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 23, 2024
…3229)

First step in implementing
#3144

- switch statement `Table` candidate mapping from `ParaId` to
`CoreIndex`
- introduce experimental `InjectCoreIndex`  node feature.
- determine and assume a `CoreIndex` for a candidate based on statement
validator index. If the signature is valid it means validator controls
the validator that index and we can easily map it to a validator
group/core.
- introduce a temporary provisioner fix until we fully enable elastic
scaling in the subystem. The fix ensures we don't fetch the same
backable candidate when calling `get_backable_candidate` for each core.

TODO:
- [x] fix backing tests
- [x] fix statement table tests
- [x] add new test

---------

Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>
Signed-off-by: alindima <alin@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: alindima <alin@parity.io>
eskimor pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 23, 2024
…rent cores (#3231)

Fixes #3144

Builds on top of #3229

Some preparations for Runtime to support elastic scaling, guarded by
config node features bit `FeatureIndex::ElasticScalingMVP`. This PR
introduces a per-candidate `CoreIndex` but does it in a hacky way to
avoid changing `CandidateCommitments`, `CandidateReceipts` primitives
and networking protocols.

If the `ElasticScalingMVP` feature bit is enabled then
`BackedCandidate::validator_indices` is extended by 8 bits.
The value stored in these bits represents the assumed core index for the
candidate.

It is temporary solution which works by creating a mapping from
`BackedCandidate` to `CoreIndex` by assuming the `CoreIndex` can be
discovered by checking in which validator group the validator that
signed the statement is.

TODO:
- [x] fix tests
- [x] add new tests
- [x] Bump runtime API for Kusama, so we have that node features thing!
-> polkadot-fellows/runtimes#194

---------

Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>
Signed-off-by: alindima <alin@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: alindima <alin@parity.io>
eskimor pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2024
…3229)

First step in implementing
#3144

### Summary of changes
- switch statement `Table` candidate mapping from `ParaId` to
`CoreIndex`
- introduce experimental `InjectCoreIndex`  node feature.
- determine and assume a `CoreIndex` for a candidate based on statement
validator index. If the signature is valid it means validator controls
the validator that index and we can easily map it to a validator
group/core.
- introduce a temporary provisioner fix until we fully enable elastic
scaling in the subystem. The fix ensures we don't fetch the same
backable candidate when calling `get_backable_candidate` for each core.

TODO:
- [x] fix backing tests
- [x] fix statement table tests
- [x] add new test

---------

Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>
Signed-off-by: alindima <alin@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: alindima <alin@parity.io>
eskimor pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2024
…rent cores (#3231)

Fixes #3144

Builds on top of #3229

### Summary
Some preparations for Runtime to support elastic scaling, guarded by
config node features bit `FeatureIndex::ElasticScalingMVP`. This PR
introduces a per-candidate `CoreIndex` but does it in a hacky way to
avoid changing `CandidateCommitments`, `CandidateReceipts` primitives
and networking protocols.

#### Including `CoreIndex` in `BackedCandidate`
If the `ElasticScalingMVP` feature bit is enabled then
`BackedCandidate::validator_indices` is extended by 8 bits.
The value stored in these bits represents the assumed core index for the
candidate.

It is temporary solution which works by creating a mapping from
`BackedCandidate` to `CoreIndex` by assuming the `CoreIndex` can be
discovered by checking in which validator group the validator that
signed the statement is.

TODO:
- [x] fix tests
- [x] add new tests
- [x] Bump runtime API for Kusama, so we have that node features thing!
-> polkadot-fellows/runtimes#194

---------

Signed-off-by: Andrei Sandu <andrei-mihail@parity.io>
Signed-off-by: alindima <alin@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: alindima <alin@parity.io>
@patriciobcs patriciobcs self-assigned this Apr 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
R0-silent Changes should not be mentioned in any release notes T0-node This PR/Issue is related to the topic “node”. T8-polkadot This PR/Issue is related to/affects the Polkadot network.
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants