-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 704
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
approval-voting: remove some inefficiences on startup #3747
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ordian
added
R0-silent
Changes should not be mentioned in any release notes
T0-node
This PR/Issue is related to the topic “node”.
labels
Mar 19, 2024
alexggh
approved these changes
Mar 21, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me!
sandreim
approved these changes
Mar 21, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👌
alindima
approved these changes
Mar 21, 2024
dharjeezy
pushed a commit
to dharjeezy/polkadot-sdk
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 24, 2024
Small refactoring to reduce the algorithmic complexity of the initial message distribution in approval voting after a sync from O(n_candidates ^ 2) to O(n_candidates).
2 tasks
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 26, 2024
Fixes #3826. The docs on the `candidates` field of `BlockEntry` were incorrectly stating that they are sorted by core index. The (incorrect) optimization was introduced in #3747 based on this assumption. The actual ordering is based on `CandidateIncluded` events ordering in the runtime. We revert this optimization here. - [x] verify the underlying issue - [x] add a regression test --------- Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
dharjeezy
pushed a commit
to dharjeezy/polkadot-sdk
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 9, 2024
…tytech#3831) Fixes paritytech#3826. The docs on the `candidates` field of `BlockEntry` were incorrectly stating that they are sorted by core index. The (incorrect) optimization was introduced in paritytech#3747 based on this assumption. The actual ordering is based on `CandidateIncluded` events ordering in the runtime. We revert this optimization here. - [x] verify the underlying issue - [x] add a regression test --------- Co-authored-by: Bastian Köcher <git@kchr.de>
This was referenced Jun 5, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Small refactoring to reduce the algorithmic complexity of the initial message distribution in approval voting after a sync from O(n_candidates ^ 2) to O(n_candidates).