-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 746
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
polkadot-parachain: compile separate lib and bin #5288
polkadot-parachain: compile separate lib and bin #5288
Conversation
f77f319
to
be75466
Compare
be75466
to
f18d191
Compare
f18d191
to
650f007
Compare
@@ -14,13 +14,11 @@ | |||
// You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License | |||
// along with Cumulus. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. | |||
|
|||
use crate::chain_spec::{ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@athei is this parachain even needed anymore? perhaps we should remove it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We are working on a new testnet for for pallet_revive, I think it's safe to get rid of this one now
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay, something to do in a follow-up then @serban300 :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Opened PR #5471 for this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm module some kind of usage doc. What can I do with this lib now? what benefit it has to a parachain team? (except if you are @xlc and you know because you requested this 😉)
You can put it in the main lib.rs, and in the PR description.
@PierreBesson from what I can see, you should brace for either:
- Parity needs to generate its own omni-node in order to keep things like
--chain asset-hub
backwards compatible. - Parity should prepare to replace all
--chain <fixed-string>
to--chain <json-file>
.
In all honesty, I regret not pushing harder for separating polkadot-parachain
and omni-node
. We could have left polkadot-parachain
as is for eternity, and started working on a fresh fork of it, giving us all the flexibility in the world. The fact that the omni-node is called polkadot-parachain
(we agreed to not rename it in a separate PR) also still sounds counterproductive to me. It is buzz-killer. I do hope we rename it someday once the dust has settled :)
The benefit of what we do now is it that we are forced to dogfood the process of going from --chain name
to --chain spec.json
.
The CI pipeline was cancelled due to failure one of the required jobs. |
[features] | ||
default = [] | ||
runtime-benchmarks = [ | ||
"cumulus-primitives-core/runtime-benchmarks", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we probably can remove all those features. I don't really know why they exists at the first place
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If it's related to runtime-benchmarks
I answered on a different comment below
|
||
[features] | ||
default = [] | ||
runtime-benchmarks = [ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what are those for? we should use the standalone bencher and try-runtime-cli
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We still need them in the CI for the bot ...
commands. There is an item for removing them after we migrate the CI commands to the omni-bencher: #4966
cumulus/polkadot-parachain/polkadot-parachain-lib/src/common/chain_spec.rs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
I am trying this at https://github.com/AcalaNetwork/acala-node |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
you will need the build.rs file in the bin, not in the lib
CommandConfig -> RunConfig copyright start year -> u16
Done |
Removed the
I guess this is normal since probably both versions are needed. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good and useful to me, nice work!
cumulus/polkadot-parachain/polkadot-parachain-lib/src/common/chain_spec.rs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
cumulus/polkadot-parachain/polkadot-parachain-lib/src/common/chain_spec.rs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
5ca3d2e
Related to: #5210 Follow-up for #5288, as per this comment: #5288 (comment) I hope I understood this correctly.
Related to #5210