Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[stable2407] Backport #6427 #6593

Closed

Conversation

paritytech-cmd-bot-polkadot-sdk[bot]

Backport #6427 into stable2407 from iulianbarbu.

See the documentation on how to use this bot.

@paritytech-cmd-bot-polkadot-sdk
Copy link
Author

Please cherry-pick the changes locally and resolve any conflicts.

git fetch origin backport-6427-to-stable2407
git worktree add --checkout .worktree/backport-6427-to-stable2407 backport-6427-to-stable2407
cd .worktree/backport-6427-to-stable2407
git reset --hard HEAD^
git cherry-pick -x 1f7765b63530e362d6b1b4a225b47daddda03637
git push --force-with-lease

@github-actions github-actions bot added the A3-backport Pull request is already reviewed well in another branch. label Nov 21, 2024
Copy link

This pull request is amending an existing release. Please proceed with extreme caution,
as to not impact downstream teams that rely on the stability of it. Some things to consider:

  • Backports are only for 'patch' or 'minor' changes. No 'major' or other breaking change.
  • Should be a legit fix for some bug, not adding tons of new features.
  • Must either be already audited or trivial (not sure audit).
Emergency Bypass

If you really need to bypass this check: add validate: false to each crate
in the Prdoc where a breaking change is introduced. This will release a new major
version of that crate and all its reverse dependencies and basically break the release.

@iulianbarbu iulianbarbu added the R0-silent Changes should not be mentioned in any release notes label Nov 22, 2024
iulianbarbu and others added 2 commits November 22, 2024 14:37
This PR adds the required changes to release `polkadot`,
`polkadot-parachain` and `polkadot-omni-node` binaries built on Apple
Sillicon macos.

This addresses requests from the community for such binaries: #802, and
they should be part of the Github release page.

Test on paritytech-stg solely focused on macos binaries:
https://github.com/paritytech-stg/polkadot-sdk/actions/runs/11824692766/job/32946793308,
except the steps related to `pgpkms` (which need AWS credentials,
missing from paritytech-stg). The binary names don't have a `darwin-arm`
identifier, and conflict with the existing x86_64-linux binaries. I
haven't tested building everything on `paritytech-stg` because the
x86_64-linux builds run on `unbutu-latest-m` which isn't enabled on
`pairtytech-stg` (and I haven't asked CI team to enable one), so testing
how to go around naming conflicts should be covered next.

- [x] Test the workflow start to end (especially the last bits related
to uploading the binaries on S3 and ensuring the previous binaries and
the new ones coexist harmoniously on S3/action artifacts storage without
naming conflicts) @EgorPopelyaev
- [x] Publish the arm binaries on the Github release page - to clarify
what's needed @iulianbarbu . Current practice is to manually publish the
binaries built via `release-build-rc.yml` workflow, taken from S3. Would
be great to have the binaries there in the first place before working on
automating this, but I would also do it in a follow up PR.

- [ ] unify the binaries building under
`release-30_publish_release_draft.yml` maybe?
- [ ] automate binary artifacts upload to S3 in
`release-30_publish_release_draft.yml`

---------

Signed-off-by: Iulian Barbu <iulian.barbu@parity.io>
Co-authored-by: EgorPopelyaev <egor@parity.io>
Signed-off-by: Iulian Barbu <iulian.barbu@parity.io>
@iulianbarbu iulianbarbu force-pushed the backport-6427-to-stable2407 branch from 627824f to b7cbeb0 Compare November 22, 2024 14:39
@iulianbarbu
Copy link
Contributor

iulianbarbu commented Nov 27, 2024

Same for stable2407 as for 2409: #6594 (comment).
cc @EgorPopelyaev

@EgorPopelyaev
Copy link
Contributor

I'll close this one for now, as the pipeline backports need more precise look on what to backport, will do it manually and will open a new one later.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A3-backport Pull request is already reviewed well in another branch. R0-silent Changes should not be mentioned in any release notes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants