Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 15, 2023. It is now read-only.

Chain-selection subsystem data revert #5350

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Apr 28, 2022
Merged

Chain-selection subsystem data revert #5350

merged 15 commits into from
Apr 28, 2022

Conversation

davxy
Copy link
Member

@davxy davxy commented Apr 19, 2022

Partially addresses #5396

This PR introduces the revert of some of the data related to parachains management.

In particular, this addresses revert of chain-selection subsystem.

More work should be done to revert approval voting information, this will be addressed by a separate PR.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the A3-in_progress Pull request is in progress. No review needed at this stage. label Apr 19, 2022
@davxy davxy added B0-silent Changes should not be mentioned in any release notes C1-low PR touches the given topic and has a low impact on builders. labels Apr 20, 2022
@davxy davxy requested review from drahnr, bkchr, andresilva and a team April 20, 2022 14:32
@davxy davxy marked this pull request as ready for review April 20, 2022 16:14
@github-actions github-actions bot added A0-please_review Pull request needs code review. and removed A3-in_progress Pull request is in progress. No review needed at this stage. labels Apr 20, 2022
@davxy davxy requested a review from a team April 20, 2022 16:14
node/service/src/lib.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
node/service/src/lib.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@drahnr drahnr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Generally looks good, a few nits that need to be addressed or clarified. We should also document what is reverted and what is not and reference an issue for outstanding TODOs.

@davxy davxy mentioned this pull request Apr 26, 2022
4 tasks
@davxy
Copy link
Member Author

davxy commented Apr 26, 2022

Generally looks good, a few nits that need to be addressed or clarified. We should also document what is reverted and what is not and reference an issue for outstanding TODOs.

@drahnr

I already started working on the "approval-voting" subsystem revert, but before opening a PR for that, this needs to be merged since some code is shared.

If it is not a problem, I prefer to keep the PRs for the subtasks separated in order to simplify the review.

@davxy davxy requested a review from drahnr April 26, 2022 16:27
node/service/src/lib.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@drahnr
Copy link
Contributor

drahnr commented Apr 27, 2022

Looks good to me, greenlit from my side. I prefer smaller reviewable PRs, so very much in favor of splitting the work into concise chunks as you do 👍

davxy and others added 2 commits April 27, 2022 10:08
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Kunert <skunert49@gmail.com>
@davxy davxy self-assigned this Apr 27, 2022
@davxy davxy merged commit 6503d68 into master Apr 28, 2022
@davxy davxy deleted the davxy-revert-command-fix branch April 28, 2022 15:44
@davxy davxy mentioned this pull request May 3, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
A0-please_review Pull request needs code review. B0-silent Changes should not be mentioned in any release notes C1-low PR touches the given topic and has a low impact on builders.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants