This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 15, 2023. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix pallet bags list and doc #10231
Fix pallet bags list and doc #10231
Changes from 4 commits
c1550d2
29ce8c0
ed1fb34
c2f6366
eb90700
2e72037
ce7fff7
fede886
61e8612
ee451a5
ae9c70e
18a0d8b
790456b
56e3ede
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe call this
unsafe_clear
then? To make the user aware of the problems?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
also in pallet-bags-list when implementing the function
SortedListProvider::regenerate
it callsclear
inside. Should we also prepend unsafe to regenerate ? WDYT @kianenigmaThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes we should
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
addressed in fede886
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Its just a crazy api. This is absolutely not an "expected" behavior, and we shouldn't really expose such weird things in this way...
We need apis like this which are both bounded and behave in expected ways.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes I agree, IMO we should at least have sp_io::storage::clear_prefix return the exact number of value removed (in both overlay and backend).