Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove
substrate-compat
default feature flag #1078Remove
substrate-compat
default feature flag #1078Changes from 1 commit
6836f9b
4091501
538a55a
e6bdea3
6ebb190
32210d5
78a5e96
1686260
6ddeb74
6f7f7ba
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These should be unnecessary shouldn't they? The
wasm-rpc-tests
crate doesn't expose any features, and so this should have no effect.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🎉
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ooh, putting the feature on a block is much cleaner than my suggesiton; good idea!
I'd suggest hiding these lines though (with a
#
prefix) and not indenting the rest, since (a) most of it doesn't require that feature and (b) we talk about needing it above anyway, so keeping the example code neater feels better :)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@tadeohepperle this is the only thing left that I'd like to see done :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It might be a slightly better user experience to throw a compile_error if the target isn't
wasm32
andjsonrpsee
expects that, eg:So that users know what the issue is if things don't compile properly with these features.
It also self documents for future us why that target_arch is there :)