Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add config.yml for issue links #5

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 28, 2021
Merged

Add config.yml for issue links #5

merged 1 commit into from
May 28, 2021

Conversation

TomWFox
Copy link
Contributor

@TomWFox TomWFox commented May 21, 2021

  • Added config.yml file

I could also add a default bug report and feature request issue template which would work for most repos but not all. For example, it wouldn't make sense on this repo or the governance repo - most/all such repos are fairly insignificant (in terms of issues) so it could be fine.

@TomWFox
Copy link
Contributor Author

TomWFox commented May 21, 2021

Thoughts @mtrezza @davimacedo?

@mtrezza

This comment has been minimized.

@TomWFox TomWFox marked this pull request as ready for review May 24, 2021 15:49
@TomWFox
Copy link
Contributor Author

TomWFox commented May 24, 2021

@mtrezza Thanks for your thoughts. I've move my suggestion for a PR template and your comments over to a new issue as it seems it would benefit from a broader discussion about what makes sense for a default template, or whether there should be one at all.

I've also marked the PR as ready for review as I think adding the stack overflow and forum links are a nice improvement as is.

@TomWFox TomWFox requested a review from mtrezza May 24, 2021 15:52
@TomWFox TomWFox changed the title Add issue & pull request files Add config.yml for issue links May 27, 2021
@TomWFox TomWFox requested a review from davimacedo May 27, 2021 12:04
Copy link
Member

@davimacedo davimacedo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks good to me.

Copy link
Member

@mtrezza mtrezza left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

I think the logical follow-up PRs would be to override this default in the repos for which we have specific SO tags. For example the client sdk repos, should point to their own tags on SO.

@TomWFox TomWFox merged commit 5affcc7 into main May 28, 2021
@TomWFox TomWFox deleted the TomWFox-patch-1 branch May 28, 2021 12:53
@TomWFox
Copy link
Contributor Author

TomWFox commented May 28, 2021

I think the logical follow-up PRs would be to override this default in the repos for which we have specific SO tags. For example the client sdk repos, should point to their own tags on SO.

Possibly, although for Parse Server we have a link to the parse-platform tag. Maybe we could have a link with both the parse-platform tag and repo specific tag - https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/parse-platform+parse-server. Only downside is that won't surface questions that only have the repo specific tag.

Edit: I noticed my suggestion is how you've already done it for the JS SDK (https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/parse-platform+parse-javascript-sdk)

@TomWFox
Copy link
Contributor Author

TomWFox commented May 28, 2021

It seems this change hasn't worked out as intended. Although not obvious in the documentation, I think there has to be at least one issue template for the 'issue chooser' to show up - that'll be my next task!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants