-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add config.yml for issue links #5
Conversation
Thoughts @mtrezza @davimacedo? |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@mtrezza Thanks for your thoughts. I've move my suggestion for a PR template and your comments over to a new issue as it seems it would benefit from a broader discussion about what makes sense for a default template, or whether there should be one at all. I've also marked the PR as ready for review as I think adding the stack overflow and forum links are a nice improvement as is. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It looks good to me.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
I think the logical follow-up PRs would be to override this default in the repos for which we have specific SO tags. For example the client sdk repos, should point to their own tags on SO.
Possibly, although for Parse Server we have a link to the parse-platform tag. Maybe we could have a link with both the parse-platform tag and repo specific tag - https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/parse-platform+parse-server. Only downside is that won't surface questions that only have the repo specific tag. Edit: I noticed my suggestion is how you've already done it for the JS SDK (https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/parse-platform+parse-javascript-sdk) |
It seems this change hasn't worked out as intended. Although not obvious in the documentation, I think there has to be at least one issue template for the 'issue chooser' to show up - that'll be my next task! |
I could also add a default bug report and feature request issue template which would work for most repos but not all. For example, it wouldn't make sense on this repo or the governance repo - most/all such repos are fairly insignificant (in terms of issues) so it could be fine.