Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bolts causing CI failure #1759

Closed
4 tasks done
dplewis opened this issue Oct 8, 2023 · 5 comments · Fixed by #1763
Closed
4 tasks done

Bolts causing CI failure #1759

dplewis opened this issue Oct 8, 2023 · 5 comments · Fixed by #1763
Labels
type:ci CI related issue

Comments

@dplewis
Copy link
Member

dplewis commented Oct 8, 2023

New Issue Checklist

Issue Description

Build Failed
	Task failed with exit code 65:
	/usr/bin/xcrun xcodebuild -project /Users/runner/work/Parse-SDK-iOS-OSX/Parse-SDK-iOS-OSX/Carthage/Checkouts/Bolts-ObjC/Bolts.xcodeproj -scheme Bolts-iOS-Dynamic -configuration Release -derivedDataPath /Users/runner/Library/Caches/org.carthage.CarthageKit/DerivedData/14.3.1_14E300c/Bolts-ObjC/1.9.1 -sdk iphoneos ONLY_ACTIVE_ARCH=NO CODE_SIGNING_REQUIRED=NO CODE_SIGN_IDENTITY= CARTHAGE=YES archive VALIDATE_WORKSPACE=NO -archivePath /var/folders/r_/vbvvglrx3lvds6dp_mbyq3_c0000gn/T/Bolts-ObjC SKIP_INSTALL=YES GCC_INSTRUMENT_PROGRAM_FLOW_ARCS=NO CLANG_ENABLE_CODE_COVERAGE=NO STRIP_INSTALLED_PRODUCT=NO (launched in /Users/runner/work/Parse-SDK-iOS-OSX/Parse-SDK-iOS-OSX/Carthage/Checkouts/Bolts-ObjC)
@parse-github-assistant
Copy link

Thanks for opening this issue!

  • 🚀 You can help us to fix this issue faster by opening a pull request with a failing test. See our Contribution Guide for how to make a pull request, or read our New Contributor's Guide if this is your first time contributing.

@mtrezza
Copy link
Member

mtrezza commented Oct 8, 2023

Interesting that the CI passed for the PR branch but failed for the master branch. Could that be because of the Cache Carthage step? It could have cached something that is not generated anymore due to the PR, that's why it may still have passed, but then failed on the master branch where there was no cache. If so, then we should probably remove the Cache Carthage step from the CI to avoid that in the future.

@dplewis
Copy link
Member Author

dplewis commented Oct 8, 2023

Interesting that the CI passed for the PR branch

Thats old news

Could that be because of the Cache Carthage step?

I already tried that dplewis#10

@mtrezza mtrezza added the type:ci CI related issue label Oct 8, 2023
@mtrezza
Copy link
Member

mtrezza commented Oct 8, 2023

Does this affect the SDK when adding it via SPM or only the CI?

@dplewis
Copy link
Member Author

dplewis commented Oct 9, 2023

Looks like SPM is working but CI using Carthage breaks.

#1758

I’ll reopen it after some local trial and error testing

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type:ci CI related issue
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants