Skip to content

collectionPrefix & custom certificates are not available in the migration tool #1224

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
natanrolnik opened this issue Mar 28, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@natanrolnik
Copy link
Contributor

One of the good things that Parse-Server allows is collectionPrefix. It allows us using the same mongo database for different applications, thus reducing costs and overhead of maintaining different databases.

Another advantage of parse-server is that it allows using self-signed SSL certificates to encrypt connections between the server and the mongo instance.

The problem is that any of these are compatible with the current Parse.com migration tool:
1 - The ability to provide a collectionPrefix - so this way, both the hosted Parse and the parse-server, that will be reading from/writing to the database, will be able to work together until the shutdown;
2 - The option to provide a self-signed certificate so the connections to the mongo instance work correctly. (In my specific case, I purchased an SSL certificate, installed in the mongodb instance; connections to it work from command line but not from the migration tool - so I'm wondering if I should ignore SSL at all or keep trying to find the reason - for example, maybe hosted parse doesn't trust the certificate provider)

(I know this issue is not fully related to Parse-Server, but as it has to do with what's implemented here, and we hear directly and more from the Parse team, I preferred to open this issue)

@gfosco
Copy link
Contributor

gfosco commented Mar 28, 2016

Yeah, this is one of those things that I agree with and it would be nice, but it's just not going to happen... Personally I like being able to run multiple apps on the same server and database, but we're in the extreme minority, and there's no official interest in supporting this right now.

@gfosco gfosco closed this as completed Mar 28, 2016
@natanrolnik
Copy link
Contributor Author

😢 but totally understand!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants