Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add LiveQuery to parse server #1092

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 18, 2016
Merged

Conversation

wangmengyan95
Copy link
Contributor

This is a new feature for parse-server. Please check the doc and wiki for more details.

@gfosco gfosco changed the title Add LiveQuery to pares server Add LiveQuery to parse server Mar 18, 2016
@codecov-io
Copy link

Current coverage is 86.34%

Merging #1092 into master will increase coverage by +0.21% as of 097d818

@@            master   #1092   diff @@
======================================
  Files           76      91    +15
  Stmts         5105    5749   +644
  Branches      1109    1240   +131
  Methods          0       0       
======================================
+ Hit           4397    4964   +567
  Partial         13      13       
- Missed         695     772    +77

Review entire Coverage Diff as of 097d818

Powered by Codecov. Updated on successful CI builds.

@wangmengyan95 wangmengyan95 force-pushed the wangmengyan.add_livequery_support branch from 4c08661 to b96763d Compare March 18, 2016 19:18
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link

@wangmengyan95 updated the pull request.

@wangmengyan95 wangmengyan95 force-pushed the wangmengyan.add_livequery_support branch from b96763d to 555e25b Compare March 18, 2016 19:32
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link

@wangmengyan95 updated the pull request.

gfosco added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2016
@gfosco gfosco merged commit d5931f7 into master Mar 18, 2016
@gfosco gfosco deleted the wangmengyan.add_livequery_support branch March 18, 2016 19:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants