Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update eslint-plugin-flowtype to the latest version 🚀 #5902

Merged
2 commits merged into from
Aug 9, 2019

Conversation

greenkeeper[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@greenkeeper greenkeeper bot commented Aug 9, 2019

The devDependency eslint-plugin-flowtype was updated from 4.0.0 to 4.2.0.

This version is not covered by your current version range.

If you don’t accept this pull request, your project will work just like it did before. However, you might be missing out on a bunch of new features, fixes and/or performance improvements from the dependency update.


Publisher: gajus
License: BSD-3-Clause

Release Notes for v4.2.0

4.2.0 (2019-08-09)

Features

  • add --fix support to require-indexer-name (#426) (72a8a55)
Commits

The new version differs by 2 commits.

  • 72a8a55 feat: add --fix support to require-indexer-name (#426)
  • 83b48d5 feat: add require-indexer-name rule (#425)

See the full diff


FAQ and help

There is a collection of frequently asked questions. If those don’t help, you can always ask the humans behind Greenkeeper.


Your Greenkeeper bot 🌴

@ghost ghost added the Merge On Green label Aug 9, 2019
@ghost ghost merged commit 4513edb into master Aug 9, 2019
@greenkeeper greenkeeper bot deleted the greenkeeper/eslint-plugin-flowtype-4.2.0 branch August 9, 2019 22:07
UnderratedDev pushed a commit to UnderratedDev/parse-server that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2020
…y#5902)

* chore(package): update eslint-plugin-flowtype to version 4.2.0

* chore(package): update lockfile package-lock.json
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants