Added authenticatorDisplayName to ClientPropertiesOutput #526
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #526 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 74.49% 74.46% -0.03%
==========================================
Files 98 98
Lines 2639 2640 +1
Branches 446 446
==========================================
Hits 1966 1966
- Misses 570 571 +1
Partials 103 103 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
@dotnet-policy-service agree company="Aritma" |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Based on the current editors draft on https://w3c.github.io/webauthn/ a new field
authenticatorDisplayNamehas been added: https://w3c.github.io/webauthn/#dom-credentialpropertiesoutput-authenticatordisplaynameThought it would be feasible to add this field, since it provides valuable information :)