-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 163
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Some more fixes for building docs #914
Conversation
`sphinx-build -W` was complaining as this is not a option of alot and can not be found in our documentation.
The path to the present development version of alot should be prepended to sys.path in order to shadow other versions of alot installed on the system. Also it should be a directory from which the alot module is loadable. That is the root of the git repository and not one level above this. This was overlooked in pazz#912.
When checking out files from git the timestamps might not give enough information to make which files to remake. So this new target can be used to force a remake of all generated files on the next run.
@@ -47,7 +57,7 @@ | |||
|
|||
where to store outgoing mails, e.g. `maildir:///home/you/mail/Sent`. | |||
You can use mbox, maildir, mh, babyl and mmdf in the protocol part of the URL. | |||
|
|||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nitpick: should we try to avoid these trailing whitespaces to be introduced?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These look good to me.
(I'd rather OK every commit individually but I don't see how to do this..)
It would otherwise be picked up by the autogenerated docs.
I used two different approaches to remove the trailing ws from the autogen. docs. Do you think this is ok or would you prefer to remove trailing ws in the second script as well (I think that might be a bit more difficult as with the first script). |
Also NB: The "Changes approved" mark from your review was not removed by github even though I pushed new commits. |
re reviews: yes, that's strange.. next time i'll simply hold back longer :) |
Some more fixes for building docs
Sorry there where quite some things I overlooked in #912.