You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Based on the closed form of the formula (Appendix D1), I feel the right-hand chart seems to have inconsistent scaling in time dimension compared to the PDE, i.e. the time value should be 2 times what the y-axis of the graph says, or beta should be double the value.
I also find a similar problem from the downloaded file from the url listed in data_download, where the dataset for the Advection dataset doesn't seem to be consistent with the Advection formula due to the similar scaling issue (based on just observing the array in the returned object).
Thanks in advance for your response.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thank you very much for your kind pointing out!
Actually it results from a very silly typo in the code generating code that has been fixed in the latest version.
The regenerated dataset will be released soon. We are also preparing for an update of arXiv paper with recalculated results on the new dataset..
Hi @apivich-h,
The code and datasets have been updated addressing the issue. The new datasets are already available on the PDEBENCH - DARUS repository.
From Fig. 6 of the paper (in the Appendix):
Based on the closed form of the formula (Appendix D1), I feel the right-hand chart seems to have inconsistent scaling in time dimension compared to the PDE, i.e. the time value should be 2 times what the y-axis of the graph says, or beta should be double the value.
I also find a similar problem from the downloaded file from the url listed in
data_download
, where the dataset for the Advection dataset doesn't seem to be consistent with the Advection formula due to the similar scaling issue (based on just observing the array in the returned object).Thanks in advance for your response.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: