-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Interest in ExtractStrict
?
#37
Comments
Sure, I'd take a PR for that. Also might as well add |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Any interest / reason to not want this type added? I can make a PR if so:
context:
Seems like the TS team's reasoning for making their official
Omit
non-strict included the fact thatExtract
was also non-strict, which is something I just ran into wanting. Just likeOmitStrict
,ExtractStrict
will get the compiler to help out during refactoring things like this, or to prevent typos in the string keys:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: