generated from martinthomson/internet-draft-template
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
Issues: peppelinux/draft-demarco-oauth-status-assertions
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Author
Label
Projects
Milestones
Assignee
Sort
Issues list
[Draft Name Change] OAuth vs SPICE Status Assertions
ietf-comments
#74
opened Jun 12, 2024 by
peppelinux
More explaination about the requirement about revocations verification
ietf-comments
#73
opened Jun 12, 2024 by
peppelinux
why cnf is required in the status assertion object?
under-discussion
#68
opened Jun 11, 2024 by
peppelinux
[Requirements] Multiple status assertion for a single credential
#60
opened May 25, 2024 by
peppelinux
Move all the comparison with Status List in an issue and remove them from the specs
wontfix
This will not be worked on
#50
opened May 20, 2024 by
peppelinux
Comparison with Status list - Define use case for this status attestation mechanism
question
Further information is requested
wontfix
This will not be worked on
#28
opened Mar 19, 2024 by
awoie
Define Mechanism for Verifiers to Request Fresh Status Attestations
enhancement
New feature or request
out-of-scope
wontfix
This will not be worked on
#22
opened Feb 28, 2024 by
peppelinux
ProTip!
no:milestone will show everything without a milestone.