Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for wildcard in URL field #199

Open
ghost opened this issue Feb 3, 2015 · 4 comments
Open

Support for wildcard in URL field #199

ghost opened this issue Feb 3, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Feb 3, 2015

Hello,

I use KeepassHTTP to manage all the logins to web portals of various devices in our private network. These do not have DNS entries but are accessed simply by IP.

Without going into too much detail, there are many, many IPs with a common network or host portion of the address, which all use the same username and password to login.

For example, imaging logging into a home router:

192.168.1.1

...but now you have over a hundred of these routers to manage. Thankfully they are all addressed such that:

192.168.x.1 with x being a random number between 0 and 255

I would like to be able to catch all these cases with one entry in the Keepass database, such as 192.168.*.1

Using references within Keepass would work, but duplicating entries enough times to cover all devices we manage would be impractical.

@carestad
Copy link

I would also appreciate this, being able to use it in the same manner. I've tried setting the URL field to just https://192.168 for instance but that doesn't work either. Would love to be able to set it to just https://192.168.% or https://192.168.*, or even better https://192.168.*.1 as mentioned above.

@rkresha
Copy link

rkresha commented Sep 27, 2016

Agree. For me, it's a matter of port... (e.g. http://192.168.0.99:552 would pull its U:P from an entry with title http://192.168.0.99:*).

@dev88m
Copy link

dev88m commented Nov 29, 2016

@pfn Are you planning to implement this functionality?

@pfn
Copy link
Owner

pfn commented Dec 1, 2016 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants