You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What do you think about providing either an additional sub-libraries with some general implementation of the "most used patterns" or providing them directly with patterns.meta. I think that the "most used patterns" will be the ones that are already given in the pattern library. So that would be something like
horizontal lines, vertical lines, north east lines, north west lines --> Lines
grid, crosshatch --> Hachures
dots, crosshatch dots --> Dots
fivepointed stars, sixpointed stars --> Stars
bricks --> Bricks
checkerboard --> Checkerboard
I suggest to use capital names, because this would be consistent to the arrows.meta library. What do you think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is a copy of #602 (comment).
What do you think about providing either an additional sub-libraries with some general implementation of the "most used patterns" or providing them directly with
patterns.meta
. I think that the "most used patterns" will be the ones that are already given in thepattern
library. So that would be something likehorizontal lines
,vertical lines
,north east lines
,north west lines
-->Lines
grid
,crosshatch
-->Hachures
dots
,crosshatch dots
-->Dots
fivepointed stars
,sixpointed stars
-->Stars
bricks
-->Bricks
checkerboard
-->Checkerboard
I suggest to use capital names, because this would be consistent to the
arrows.meta
library. What do you think?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: