Bump base, lens and possibly others for GHC 9.10.1

[wolfgangwalther]

No description provided.

[ysangkok]

@phadej This should now be unblocked, if it was blocked because of a missing cabal-install-3.12 release.

[phadej]

it wasn't

[ysangkok]

Just for curiosity, is there another blocker?

[phadej]

I'm not aware of any.

I do my best to update libraries I wrote & maintain. I do that in some not-very-deterministic order, but it will happen eventually. Pinging me won't make me do that faster nor change the order.

And I don't really need help in bounds bumping. I'd need to give up maintainership completely, so I don't need to worry about the library ever again. For most libraries I wouldn't, as I care about them enough. But insert-ordered-containers isn't a library I use anywhere myself anymore, so I'd be more than happy to transfer ownership to someone else.

[ysangkok]

Pinging @maksbotan or @swamp-agr, maybe they would be interested, since this package seems to be mostly used because it is a dependency of swagger2 and openapi3.

Do you want to transfer ownership to just a single person, or wouldn't you mind to have multiple people added? If you look at e.g. Servant, it has accrued a large amount of Hackage maintainers over time. Not sure if I like that model, because it can mean that nobody feels responsible, but OTOH it doesn't seem to be abused. So you could argue that it makes it easier to avoid the package takeover process, since it is more likely that there is somebody available to hand over the maintainer bit.

[phadej]

Do you want to transfer ownership to just a single person, or wouldn't you mind to have multiple people added?

The keyword is transfer (it implies I'm not involved anymore), what happens after should not be my worry.