Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update dependency express-list-endpoints to v6 #812

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link

@renovate renovate bot commented Jul 29, 2021

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
express-list-endpoints ^5.0.0 -> ^6.0.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

AlbertoFdzM/express-list-endpoints

v6.0.0

Compare Source

Deprecated
  • BREAKING CHANGE Drop support for NodeJS v10
Fixed
  • Fixed a problem when parsing the property middlewares for each endpoint being allocated in middleware property instead
Dev
  • Added CI using GitHub Actions
  • Update dev dependencies
  • Removed TravisCI from the project
  • Refactor code to use new JS methods and improve readability

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, click this checkbox.

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/express-list-endpoints-6.x branch from 5eeb47f to b1b1960 Compare September 3, 2021 16:17
@pharindoko pharindoko closed this Aug 18, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants