We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Roche user reported descrepancty between admiral daids grading and internal SAS tool.
No response
In Admiral 0.12.3, atoxgr_criteria_daids shows “Absolute Lymphocyte Count, Low (> 5 years of age and not HIV infected)” grade criteria as: “case_when( is.na(AVAL) | is.na(BRTHDT) | is.na(LBDT) ~ NA_character_, signif(AVAL, signif_dig) < 0.35 ~ “4”, signif(AVAL, signif_dig) < 0.5 ~ “3”, signif(AVAL, signif_dig) < 0.6 ~ “2”, signif(AVAL, signif_dig) < 0.65 ~ “1”, signif(AVAL, signif_dig) <= 0.65 ~ “0” )”
Note: Grade 0 should be >= 0.65 not <= 0.65
>= 0.65
<= 0.65
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Closes #2284 add issue number to NEWS (#2287)
35a945a
add issue number to NEWS
millerg23
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
What happened?
Roche user reported descrepancty between admiral daids grading and internal SAS tool.
Session Information
No response
Reproducible Example
In Admiral 0.12.3, atoxgr_criteria_daids shows “Absolute Lymphocyte Count, Low (> 5 years of age and not HIV infected)” grade criteria as:
“case_when( is.na(AVAL) | is.na(BRTHDT) | is.na(LBDT) ~ NA_character_, signif(AVAL, signif_dig) < 0.35 ~ “4”, signif(AVAL, signif_dig) < 0.5 ~ “3”, signif(AVAL, signif_dig) < 0.6 ~ “2”, signif(AVAL, signif_dig) < 0.65 ~ “1”, signif(AVAL, signif_dig) <= 0.65 ~ “0” )”
Note: Grade 0 should be
>= 0.65
not<= 0.65
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: