Was the README.md generated by grunt published-README or grunt unpublished-README?

[samreid]

From #5, what should the README for density-buoyancy-common look like? It seems like https://github.com/phetsims/circuit-construction-kit-common/ has a generated one. The density-buoyancy-common one looks reasonable but doesn't match the code review document so I thought I'd mention it.

[jonathanolson]

I usually consider this applying to sim repos. density-buoyancy-common isn't a sim repo (it won't get published on its own), so the CCK-common one looks... incorrect.

Thoughts? Should this be discussed at a dev meeting?

[samreid]

counting-common has unpublished-README. inverse-square-law-common has a custom README. number-line-common has a custom README. Hopefully we can decide this on slack, I'll reach out.

[samreid]

We agreed it is OK for common code repos to have custom README.md files. The density-buoyancy-common one looks good. Back to @samreid to update the code review checklist to indicate that is OK.

[samreid]

I noted this in the code review checklist. Closing.