Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is the LICENSE file correct? (Generally GPL v3 for sims and MIT for common code, see this thread for additional information). #45

Closed
Tracked by #5
samreid opened this issue Aug 11, 2021 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@samreid
Copy link
Member

samreid commented Aug 11, 2021

For circuit-construction-kit-common, it was decided that repo should be licensed as GPL since it is very sim-specific, I suspect the same applies for density-buoyancy-common. For #5.

Should we also update the code review document?

@jonathanolson
Copy link
Contributor

Sounds good to me, @kathy-phet can you verify?

Should we also update the code review document?

Also, @kathy-phet, does this sound correct in general?

@AgustinVallejo AgustinVallejo assigned zepumph and unassigned kathy-phet Feb 9, 2024
zepumph added a commit to phetsims/phet-info that referenced this issue Mar 26, 2024
Signed-off-by: Michael Kauzmann <michael.kauzmann@colorado.edu>
@zepumph
Copy link
Member

zepumph commented Mar 26, 2024

That seems very reasonable to me! Updated to CRC to note "very sim-like common repos" as GPL v3.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants