Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jul 16, 2025. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@chr-hertel
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

- service: 'llm_chain.chain.research'
name: 'wikipedia_research'
description: 'Can research on Wikipedia'
is_chain: true
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

While thinking about this, do we really need this? We know service is a ChainInterface 🤔

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

another thing of writing could be:

- service: 'llm_chain.chain.research'
+ chain: 'llm_chain.chain.research'
name: 'wikipedia_research'
description: 'Can research on Wikipedia'
- is_chain: true

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

but I think I would just remove the is_chain

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i tried to omit that thing, but failed 😢

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

but why, don't we know at that time, that the service is an instance of ChainInterface?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i'm with you on this, but i just don't know how 😆

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Alright then, but I can also set is_chain true and add anything else in service then, but we can communicate that with a clear error I guess

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

wait a sec

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

waiting again ... ⏳ 😄

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

quite in your face, yes

image

Base automatically changed from feat-0.19 to main March 20, 2025 22:48
@chr-hertel chr-hertel merged commit 3aa39fd into main Mar 20, 2025
7 checks passed
@chr-hertel chr-hertel deleted the feat-service-tools branch March 20, 2025 22:50
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants