Skip to content

New wordwrap method #135

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 13, 2018
Merged

New wordwrap method #135

merged 1 commit into from
May 13, 2018

Conversation

AydinHassan
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@AydinHassan AydinHassan merged commit 1bf30f8 into split-item-builder May 13, 2018
@AydinHassan AydinHassan deleted the wordwrap-again branch May 13, 2018 19:36
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented May 13, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #135 into split-item-builder will increase coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@                   Coverage Diff                    @@
##             split-item-builder     #135      +/-   ##
========================================================
+ Coverage                  94.4%   94.44%   +0.03%     
- Complexity                  417      420       +3     
========================================================
  Files                        26       26              
  Lines                      1288     1296       +8     
========================================================
+ Hits                       1216     1224       +8     
  Misses                       72       72
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
src/Util/StringUtil.php 100% <100%> (ø) 6 <5> (+3) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ff94083...f711cd3. Read the comment docs.

@AydinHassan AydinHassan added this to the 3.0 milestone May 16, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants