Don't call __set() on uninitialized typed properties #4854
Closed
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New stab at bug #78226: We introduce a type flag that distinguishes an uninitialized typed property and a property that has been explicitly
unset()
. Assigning to an uninitialized property will initialize the property and not invoke__set()
. Assigning to an explicitly unset property will invoke__set()
.This should be a compromise that both avoids WTF when using typed properties in a class with __set(), while still keeping @Ocramius's ProxyManager code working.
The patch turned out to be fairly non-intrusive, but it does disable an optimization for refcounted checks.