Add code coverage workflow #20
Conversation
sbaldu
force-pushed
the
main
branch
2 times, most recently
from
e2c1b29
to
7938389
Compare
Grufoony
added
workflow
sbaldu
force-pushed
the
main
branch
3 times, most recently
from
ce829d2
to
08fdf8b
Compare
* Refactor test files and update CMake workflow * Update test command in README.md
* Create benchmark.yml file * Change name of the workflow * Add checkout of submodules Fix typo in benchmark of street
* Remove def constructor of Street and add pair parameter to id constructor * Implement addition of nodes in `Graph::addStreet` * Rewrite base case of addStreets * Fix old definition of Street constructors * Update tests of Street for new constructors * Fix methods for building Graph * Add tests for addStreet * Formatting * Initialize `maxSpeed` in first Street constructor * Fix typo in Street tests Update benchmarks to new `Street` structure and methods
* Add nodes to nodeSet when using `addStreet` (#65) * Remove def constructor of Street and add pair parameter to id constructor * Implement addition of nodes in `Graph::addStreet` * Rewrite base case of addStreets * Fix old definition of Street constructors * Update tests of Street for new constructors * Fix methods for building Graph * Add tests for addStreet * Formatting * Initialize `maxSpeed` in first Street constructor * Fix typo in Street tests * Remove reference in variadic methods template constraint * Fix typo * Update declaration of base case * Add tests of addStreets * Fix typo * Add type trait specialization for const Nodes and Streets
* Add insert_and_expand functions to SparseMatrix * Refactor insert_and_expand function in SparseMatrix.hpp * still not working * Fix reshape bug and update unit tests * Fix matrix expansion for row vectors * Fix indentation in SparseMatrix.hpp * Fix matrix reshape and insert_and_expand functions * Fix indentation in SparseMatrix.hpp
|
This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation. |
|
@sbaldu seems like you have to generate a token even if the repository is public. Please have a look at: |
|
Moreover, we can push the output report from the coverage to the gh pages branch and set up the badge in the project Readme |
Welcome to Codecov 🎉Once you merge this PR into your default branch, you're all set! Codecov will compare coverage reports and display results in all future pull requests. Thanks for integrating Codecov - We've got you covered ☂️ |
|
@sbaldu I guess you should also add the badge to the Readme by yourself: https://docs.codecov.com/docs/status-badges |
Measures code coverage of the tests: